12 Dimensions of Our Consciousness

Image

COSMIC KATHARA GRID

COSMIC KATHARA GRID

12 Dimensions of Our Consciousness

There’s more to love about our “selves” than what’s in the mirror.  We are multidimensional beings connected to many different worlds or planes of existence.  Each plane vibrates at a different rate and possesses its own set of principles and laws.  These planes or dimensions represent increasing self-awareness and closeness to God, The One, the universal life force.

Many are feeling a planetary shift in energy or consciousness.  Consider it a kind of blueprint cleanse.  As we ascend to higher levels of consciousness we move further away from ego and closer to God.  This growth may feel uncomfortable as we are forced to disconnect from and release our attachment to this physical world.  At our highest levels of consciousness we are in service to all of humanity and the Universe as we teach and prepare lower beings to return to the original Source or God.

The first three dimensions are motions; physical motion, emotional motion and mental motion.

1st Dimension – Physical (time)

Awareness as a point in space or time.  It is the level of consciousness at which human genetic coding, water and the mineral world resonate.  For humans, this level is unconscious to our five senses.

2nd Dimension – Emotional (feeling)

Awareness as a point and line.  This is the level of consciousness of plants and the lower animal kingdom (bacteria, microbes, etc.) living only to eat, fight and procreate.  For believers, this purely biological realm may also inhabit fairies , devas, nature spirits, chemical beings, elementals and also the demonic energies. The creation Dragons can also be connected with on this level.

3rd Dimension – Mental (thought)

This is awareness of point, line, width and breadth, height and volume.  It is the conscious world as we know it; the dimension into which humanity is born and is the assigned keeper.  While we have the ability to remember the past and consider the future while remaining in the present, we remain locked in a cause/effect, time/space paradigm because the past is imprisoned in our subconscious mind.  For most, we are unaware of how we are connected to each other and the universe.  This is an ego-based existence.

The next three dimensions are space, allowing for spherical, circular and linear separation of objects.

4th Dimension – Spherical Separation

When we are awake, we are conscious in the 3rd dimension.  When we sleep we become unconscious in the third dimension and conscious in the 4th dimension.  In this dimension we are aware of point, line, width and breadth, height and volume and time.

This “higher human” consciousness is also referred to as the astral body.  This etheric body is home to advanced dreaming, intuition, psychic ability, creativity and magic.  In this dimension, feelings and thoughts create reality almost immediately; thus, feelings of fear can make this dimension a very unpleasant plane of existence.  It is the futuristic realization that no one is greater or more important than anyone else. This is the beginning of our understanding of oneness.  Some humans are born into this dimension in 3D bodies.  They are called Indigos.

5th Dimension – Circular Separation

In this dimension, there is no illusion of limitation.  It is the awareness of point, line, width and breadth, height and volume, time, and spirit.  Some Indigos are also be born into this dimension.  In the fifth dimension we are liberated to create a new paradigm of being, thinking and doing as part of the universal One.  On this plane we live in unconditional love, freedom from judgement and guilt, and unconditional forgivenness, and unconditional acceptance.  On this level we can see and communicate with angels and other stellar beings who are in a Light body.  There is no fear on this plane.

6th Dimension -Linear Separation

The 6th dimension is one of “crystal consciousness.”  Here life is playful and magical as we surrender to the flow of the evolving spirit while continuing to create on an individual level.  Humans born with their consciousness in this dimension are referred to as “Crystals.”

The following three dimensions are energy; electric, magnetic and life energy.

7th Dimension – Electric Energy

This is where we go when we time travel and visit parallel worlds.  It is a morphogenic field where we share our aura for the good of others as part of our planetary duty to heal and teach them about higher consciousness.  In this dimension we can connect with our soul family.  It is where many Light beings gather to communicate with lower levels.

8th & 9th Dimensions – Magnetic Energy and Life Energy

In the 8th dimension, we have complete control over the story of life.  It is the place of eternity where the soul is intangible, undefinable and immeasurable.

The 9th dimension is the death portal (of the soul) and incorporates the 8th dimension.  In the 9th dimension we bear full responsibility for the care of the entire planet.

The next three dimensions, the original three, are the Consciousness of the Creator.

10th Dimension

Here is where we communicate with Creation through sound and vibration.  We become aware of all the planets that make up our consciousness and assume responsibility on a solar level.

11th Dimension

In this dimension we exist as a ray of light.  Elohim (higher selves of angelic beings that inhabit this plane) and the Twin Flames can be found here.  Galactic consciousness is achieved.

12th Dimension

In the 12th dimension we return to Source and resonate in unison with the physical form of our Local Universe. We are whole.

By: RHONDA JABARI

CHAKRA SOUND HEALING

Chakra Color Seed Mantra
Ajna Indigo Om
Visuddha Sky Blue Ham
Anahata Green Yam
Manipura Yellow Ram
Svadhisthana Orange Vam
Maladhara Red Lam

Each chakra vibrates at a different frequency, from the lowest/deepest/slowest frequency at the root to the highest/fastest at the crown – with each chakra having its own sound, just like it has its own color. 

Sound is vibration.  Music and sound, good or bad, influence us and impact our energy systems.  Sound, either as music, musical notes or chanting can be used for chakra balancing – repetition supports bringing the body- 

mind-soul complex into a meditative state, where healing occurs, and creates a continuous vibrational environment. Visualization with the associated chakra color while using sound can deepen & amplify the experience. 

  

 Chakra Color Note / Tone Vowel  Vowel sound Mantra (Bija) chakra seed syllable variations 1 Root Red C UH   /     U “huh” LAM Lum Lang 

2 Sacral Orange D OOO   /  O “you” / “ewe” VAM Vum Vang 3 Solar Plexus Yellow E OH   /   AH “go” RAM Rum Rang 

4 Heart Green F AH     /   A “father” YAM Yum / Sam Yang 5 Throat Blue G EYE    /   I “I” HAM Hum Hang 

6 Third Eye Indigo A AYE    /   E “say” AUM Aum / OM Aum 7 Crown Violet B EEE    /    E “me” AH Ahh… / Aum  

   

The depth and pitch increase with each chakra note or mantra sound, with the deepest sound and lowest pitch at the root, and the highest at the crown, with the intermediate chakras calibrated between then. Notes start at middle C. 

 Bija is the Sanskrit word for the sound essence of the chakra (its seed). 

 Focus your attention on the chakra as you make its sound, either as a note, vowel or mantra sound. Vowel or mantra seed can 

be repeated or chanted 3 or more times.  

Sounds may be soft and gentle – they do not have to be loud.  You do not have to be able to carry a tune or sing to sound the chakra notes – you can sound them silently or aloud. 

 Each chakra sound, for 1 or 2, or up to 5 minutes each, starting at the root, can be chanted as part of a sound meditation 

chakra balancing exercise. You would focus on the chakra as you sound the associated note, and you can add visualiziation of the associated color to enhance the meditation. 

 

© Marlene Henkin, Mind-Body Energy Therapy   215-460-9316   marlene@henkinenergytherapy.com    http://www.henkinenergytherapy.com

VIBRATION & FREQUENCY

VIBRATION AND FREQUENCY
In understanding the properties of energy and how it behaves, it is first important to understand the terms vibration, frequency, harmony and resonance. Everything in creation, both animate and inanimate, is made up of moving energy. At the atomic and sub-atomic level there is movement of energy, wherever there is movement of energy there is vibration, and visa versa. Vibration can be described as a periodic or cyclic motion between two extremes around a mid point, a guitar string for example. When the string is plucked it moves in a cycle between two extremes around a mid point, causing a sound wave to be produced at a particular note, or frequency
The Frequency is how many times, or cycles, that are repeated in one second, and is referred to as Cycles Per Second (Cps). For example, to get note “A” requires 440 cycles per second and this is achieved by tightening or loosening the strings.
By slowing this down to 1 cycle per second (below) it can be seen that the wave motion, called a sine wave, moves through a series of changes between two extremes, passing through a mid point. It can also be seen that there is a + /- to show strength or amplitude, which are opposite polarities.
Everything that vibrates resonates at a fundamental or primary frequency, based on the configuration of energy that holds the matter together. A tuning fork is a good example of the precise configuration of matter to achieve a specific sound. A wind chime is also an example of the same material, at different lengths, each having its own unique fundamental frequency and sound. The examples below show various cycles per second, note that the base frequency is called the fundamental frequency. The fundamental frequencies for those shown below would be 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 cycles per second.
Generally, Cps are expressed in Hertz (Hz), 1 cycle = 1 Hz. One thousand cycles would be 1 Kilohertz (Khz), one million cycles per second would be 1 Megahertz (Mhz), etc, human audio peak for sound is about 20 Khz.
Frequency is generally separated into bands within what is called the visible light frequency spectrum. These bands have a Frequency Range e.g. the High Frequency (HF) spectrum bandwidth is 3Mhz – 30Mhz, the Very High Frequency (VHF) spectrum bandwidth is 30 – 300 Mhz. For the purposes of this article only Cycles Per Second will be used. The Frequency Spectrum moves up through the Visible Light spectrum, into the subatomic vibrational bandwidths and beyond. It is at the subatomic level that kundalini and chi manifest. The energetic pattern radiated by these energies can be readily captured by Kirlian photography and it is now possible to measure and map the movement of Chi energy through meridians.
HARMONICS A characteristic of energy generated by a vibration is that there will be a number of frequencies appearing up the frequency spectrum at multiples of the fundamental frequency. These are called Harmonics. The fundamental frequency is also the first harmonic.
Fundamental
(Cps)
Harmonics (Cps)
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
2
4
6
8
10
12
3
6
9
12
15
18
4
8
12
16
20
24
5
10
15
20
25
30
6
12
18
24
30
36
In the above example it can be seen that fundamentals share common frequencies at various harmonics e.g. 3 &4 share a common frequency, 12Cps at the 4th & 3rd harmonic. It can be said that at these points they are in harmony and resonate together at a common frequency. The above matrix becomes vastly more complex when all frequencies are considered.
The term sub harmonic is often misused when discussing frequency and harmonics. In a technical and scientific sense there is no such thing as a sub harmonic because fundamentals can only generate harmonics up the frequency spectrum. In the table above it can be seen that 4Cps will generate harmonics at 8, 12, 16, 20Cps etc. What is often called a sub harmonic is in fact a sub multiple of a fundamental or harmonic. Once again, referring to the table above in can be seen that 12Cps has a large a number of sub multiples including; 2, 3, 6 cps. Though sub harmonics cannot be generated naturally oscillators can be used to generate frequencies at the sub multiples that can be mixed with the fundamental, as they will resonate.
Whilst this statement is scientifically true, from an energetic principle it is false. Creational Law states that there is always an equal and opposite movement of energy for everything that is generated. From an energetic perspective there is a sub harmonic generated, that is not measured or captured by science, and in this creation it is generated into the non physical. Why? Because all movements of energy generated in the physical causes an opposite and opposing movement of energy or tone in the non physical; this is the basic nature of polarity in a fractured creation, polarity will always be expressed, in either the physical or non physical.
Frequencies resonate together when they share a common harmonic and are therefore said to be in harmony with each other, or they resonate. The following is an example of mixing frequencies together, in this case a 2Cps tone is mixed with a 24Cps tone, it can be seen that the 24Cps frequency follows the shape of the fundamental 2Cps tone.
If we were to look at this from a frequency spectrum perspective we would see the frequency spikes at 2 and 24 Cps.
DEAD BEAT When frequencies are mixed together they produce a frequency that is a composite of the whole. If two tones of the same frequency were mixed together, they would resonate. However, if one of the tones is then offset to be 180 degrees out of phase, or polarised opposite, then they would cancel each other out creating a dead beat.
When resonant frequencies are mixed together they become a composite if the whole. An analogy might be for example an orange, let us stay that the skin is 6 cps, the flesh is 8 cps, the juice is 10 cps, and gases are 12, when we mix all these frequencies together we have an orange. If we knew all the elemental frequencies of all parts of the orange we could develop a mathematical formula that would express the construction of an orange, based upon the frequencies that go to make up the orange’s resonant frequency. This is why many are obsessed with the use of mathematics as they see that mathematics can be used to express aspects of creation by way of a formula.
If a tasteless and odourless 3 Cps non resonant toxin is injected into the orange, it would still, look, taste and smell like an orange, however it would be harmful. If one were to look at this from a frequency perspective they would see that a non resonant frequency exists at 3Cps. The solution to get rid of the toxic frequency would be to either remove it, or to apply a frequency of the opposite polarity to cancel it out, or Dead Beat it, which would be the antidote.
THE HUMAN EXPRESSION The human body consists of many elements of different properties and densities, skin, bone, various liquids, minerals, water, etc and these are woven together in an orchestrated symphony of tones that make up the physical form. This is called the body’s Resonant Frequency, or energetic signature, sitting within the frequency bandwidth of human expression. The human form is special in that it is able to resonate or tune into a very broad vibrational bandwidth of frequencies, from the gross to the subtle. There are a number of senses that can be used to tune into the subtle energies, each will have a predominant sense that is best developed or refined to tune into these energies. One’s resonant frequency is unique to oneself; however these vibrations are generally a harmonic of Earth’s own unique frequency, the creation which we are part of.Everything in creation vibrates, this includes both ends of the frequency spectrum, which is often termed Polar Opposites, good/bad, saintly/demonic, rich/poor, abuse/honour, Yin/Yang, male/female. It would be true to say that we all sit within the darker denser vibrations in one way or another, and that none are totally isolated from such energies. However, it is also true to say that the spiritual, emotion, mental and physical journey is to transcend the darker vibrations, and to embrace the higher tones of joy, happiness, love and freedom as an expression of one�s experience. The predominant vibration of one�s resonant frequency is based on the power of their thought form; changing thought form will change vibration. It is often said that light cannot shine without the dark, from which it comes.
Another phenomena in the human expression is that of Group Thought or Group Vibration. This is where a group of individuals generate a vibration based upon a common thought or theme such as nationality, sporting clubs, religion/spiritual beliefs, ideology and symbology etc. This group vibration creates an energetic flow, or movement of energy, that embraces all that participate. Usually, these vibrations sit within a defined bandwidth, one will either resonate (tune into) or not, with a particular frequency. Not all willingly participate in a particular group but do so because of the nature of the human dance.
SHAPES, FORMATIONS AND SYMBOLS Shapes, formations and symbols are known to generate certain vibrations. Conversely, vibrations, or tones, will also generated shapes, formations and symbols. Many of these shapes are often used in connection with spiritual or metaphysical endeavours. To get a visual understanding of how frequency generates shape the reader is asked to check the following link; if you are on dial up it may take a while to watch the whole clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zkox6niJ1Wc
I would like now to provide a very basic explanation of wave mechanics and vibration to shape relationship. If we were to take a previous example of standing wave created by a guitar and view it on an oscilloscope it will be seen that there is an extreme vertical movement at the top and bottom of the wave. There are also portions of the wave where there is no vertical movement which is at the mid point of the cycle. It has been demonstrated that at these points nodes will be generated, the higher the vibration the more nodes there will be.
Two dimensionally the node concept can be used to describe how geometric shapes, such as a triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon etc, are created when the nodes are joined together by lines. These shapes produce a vibrational resonance that has a basic energetic movement from a two dimensional perspective. When geometric shapes are inscribed within a circle; which is representative of a cycle, unity or completeness, they produce a tone or energetic signature.
These two dimensional geometric shapes are often used for energetic symbology in the metaphysical community to denote a particular spiritual significance of the electrical sacred geometry. In some yogic teachings these geometric shapes also have significance in relation to chakras and colour.
There is also another form of sacred geometry derived from shapes, and this has to do with three dimensional shapes, or formations. These shapes are based upon the triangle, square and pentagon, and are called polyhedrons which are known as Platonic Solids. At the present time there are only five known shapes identified by scientists, and these are the four-sided tetrahedron, six-sided cube, eight-sided octahedron, twelve-sided dodecahedron and twenty-sided icosahedron. Each of the formations has the same shape on every side, with each line in the formation being the same length, and all the internal angles will be the same. Additionally each formation will fit perfectly inside of a sphere, with all points touching the edge of the sphere without overlaps. It can be seen that the triangle forms the face of the octahedron, tetrahedron and the icosahedron, squares form the face of the cube, and the pentagon the faces of the dodecahedron. What we are basically seeing here are three dimensional representations of vibrational energy in their basic form.
Tetrahedron – Octahedron – Cube – Icosahedron – Dodecahedron
From a three dimensional perspective as the nodes cluster together in a sphere they begin to create 3 dimensional shapes. These shapes are formed in a sphere, just as the two dimensional shapes are formed in a circle. 4 nodes evenly spaced will create a tetrahedron; 6 nodes form an octahedron; 8 nodes form a cube, twelve nodes form a icosahedron and twenty nodes a dodecahedron. The straight lines that can be seen on the geometric shapes represent the stresses that are caused by the closest distance between two points for each of the nodes as they spread themselves across the surface of the sphere.
In relation to polarity every movement of energy generates an opposite and opposing movement of energy, or polar opposite, and this is also the case with Platonic shapes which also have a dual. For every Platonic polyhedron there exists another Platonic polyhedron in which faces and vertices occupy complementary locations, which is known as the dual, or reciprocal. The dual of Platonic solids can be created by connecting the midpoints of the sides surrounding each polyhedron. The term symmetry is used to describe the relationship between the shapes, symmetry can best be described as balance amongst systems, or between parts of systems.
The process of forming duals for the Platonic solids is illustrated below. The top row shows the original solids. The middle row shows the vertex figures of the original solid as lines superimposed on the tangential polygons, forming the corresponding duals. Finally, the polyhedron compounds consisting of a polyhedron and its dual are illustrated in the bottom row.
Please read the following quote:
Both the students of Buckminster Fuller and his prot�g� Dr. Hans Jenny devised clever experiments that showed how the Platonic Solids would form within a vibrating / pulsating sphere. In the experiment conducted by Fuller�s students, a spherical balloon was dipped in dye and pulsed with �pure� sound frequencies, known as the �Diatonic� sound ratios. A small number of evenly-distanced nodes would form across the surface of the sphere, as well as thin lines that connected them to each other. If you have four evenly spaced nodes, you will see a tetrahedron. Six evenly spaced nodes form an octahedron. Eight evenly spaced nodes form a cube. Twenty evenly spaced nodes form the dodecahedron, and twelve evenly spaced nodes form the icosahedron. The straight lines that we see on these geometric objects simply represent the stresses that are created by the �closest distance between two points� for each of the nodes as they distribute themselves across the entire surface of the sphere. Sacred Geometry in the Quantum Realm
The relationship between the polyhedrons and structure of crystals and minerals is well known. Table salt is an example of how two different elements, sodium and chloride bond together to form a Platonic Solid of the Cube. Though water is not a crystal in the liquid state, the water molecule is made up of two hydrogen and one oxygen atom that form together in the shape of a tetrahedron. Another example is fluorite crystals which form the octahedron, basically all crystalline structure in creation has a molecular structure based upon either the tetrahedron, cube and octahedron. All these crystalline structures are capable of conducting “electricity” to some degree or another. There is no known natural mineral or molecule that exhibits the properties of the icosahedron or the dodecahedron, whilst these shapes have symmetry they do not have periodicity, (don�t ask!!! Too hard to explain, google it), as crystal formations. However, scientists have been able to manufacture material that has icosahedron or the dodecahedron structures. These crystals are often called quasi crystals, material made with this structure has an extremely high strength, resistance to heat and will not conduct electricity. An example of two such materials are aluminium-copper-iron quasi-crystal alloy, which has the dodecahedron shape, and aluminium-cobalt-nickel alloy which has the shape of a decagonal 10 sided prism.
Platonic Shapes and sacred geometry has expressed across nearly all aspects of the metaphysical community. It has often been said that the Platonic Shapes represent following elements:
Tetrahedron – Fire
Cube – Earth
Octahedron – Air
Icosahedron – Water
Dodecahedron – Ether (though this is not mentioned literature ancestors provided this information)
Ken McKelvie
http://dhost.info/waterput/exploring/ken/vibration_freq_harmonics.htm#vibration

The History of Earth

In the Beginning

In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth — okay you know that part. About 100 million years ago, a group of souls called the Founders, originating in the systems of Lyra and Vega, and later the Pleiades, came to Earth to explore what it would be like to live in a third-density world. They created a DNA blueprint for a humanoid form and populated the galaxy with similar experiments.

They tried on and off for about 90 million years to live in 3D, but it was extremely difficult to lower their vibration enough to be able to inhabit the 3D bodies. These bodies began as single-cell amoebas and gradually evolved into primates and humanoids. The Lyrans tried to embody many times, but were unsuccessful in holding their high vibrations in these primitive humanoid forms. Finally, about 10 million years ago, the Lyrans/Vegans/Pleiadeans successfully incarnated a male-female pair (known as Adam and Eve). They were 7D beings living in 3D bodies. As time went on, they became enmeshed in the 3D form and forgot their 7D heritage. This is known as the fall from grace. They learned of the knowledge of good and evil (duality) through identifying with 3D. The “apple” is symbolic of taking on the energy of the lower densities. After 10 million B.C., the Lyran/Vegan/Pleiadean couple and their offspring became known as the Adamic race.

During the period from 10,000,000 B.C. to about 500,000 B.C., several ET factions from various star systems attempted to take over the Earth. In about 500,000 B.C., the Orions successfully interbred with the Adamic race and diluted the consciousness of the originally peaceful and loving people. They infused their warrior-like, aggressive, competitive nature into the people of Earth.

The “negative” Orions have been visiting Earth for over 500,000 years, off and on, and even though Rigel has evolved significantly over that time, the negative factions from that system are still the dominant dark force on Earth (the Draconians, also known as Reptilians, are a minority of the so-called “dark” forces on Earth – they originated in the Alpha Draconis system). Of course, this is all going by the wayside as we approach the Great Shift.

Regarding the enslavement of humanity by the Orions: Over the past 500,000 years, the Orions have been the number one group controlling humans. Nearly 80% of humanity has Orion genetic strains. The other cohorts are Sirians, Reptilians and Greys (from various star systems including Zeta Reticuli).

The Orions are broken mostly into two factions, the Rigelians and Betelguesans (coined words, of course). The councils of Rigel are the warrior-like aggressive strain, and the councils of Beteguese are more peaceful, light-oriented. They have battled over control of Earth for millenia. The council of Betelguese were the original Illuminati when it truly meant “illumined ones.” When the council of Rigel took over, the Illuminati became corrupted and that is what we have today. Both Orion factions represented polarized light (duality) and that is why this situation has never been resolved. The solution is to transcend duality and live in the Oneness of the Infinite Creator.

The Orions are the ones responsible for the warrior-like masculine aggressive competitive-type human. They took over the human race around 500,000 years ago and the peaceful, benevolent characteristics of the original Adamic humans soon become obliterated by the Orion strain.

Yes, I know, each soul chooses its experiences and we can’t blame the Orions. Okay, we attracted them because of our level of consciousness in order to learn about slavery, mind control and how to turn a peaceful, benevolent race into aggressive warriors who fight for scraps of food and kill over differences in religious beliefs.

Anyway, the Orion control of Earth is about to fall by the wayside. Give it a few more years and they’ll be outta here.

Earth is unique among most civilizations (from what I’ve learned) in that it has both some of the most enlightened and some of the most barbaric of humans. Some so-called “higher-ups” have labeled this place a “penal colony.” I think that’s a bit harsh. But I like what Patricia Cota-Robles says regarding the “laggard souls” or those souls who have refused, lifetime after lifetime, to embrace the light.

She states that we made a soul agreement to take on the laggard souls and educate them in how to awaken. As I would surely agree, that’s an arduous task! Of course, some would say that we should not be overly concerned with the progress of the laggard souls because they are where they are supposed to be in their soul growth. That’s true, but part of their soul growth is to live on a planet with enlightened souls and to learn from them.

Notwithstanding the above, we are meeting with some success in helping them awaken. Look at the daily exposure of lies, deceit and manipulation showing up in countless websites and news sources (for example, rense.com). All this is coming to the surface of mass consciousness because of the daily increasing energy flooding the planet as a result of our collective desire to awaken (and the end of the cosmic cycle). It may be only 20% at best, but some of humanity is waking up. Waking up can be a painful process, especially for those souls who have long put their trust in our government agencies and corporations. In fact, I’d say a lot of people are in the midst of a rude awakening!

Now, back to our history of Earth:

Pan, Atlantis and Lemuria

The Hopi call our present civilization the Fourth World. There were three prior civilizations, as follows:

Pangaea (10,000,000 – 1,000,000 B.C.)

Lemuria (700,000 B.C. – 150,000 B.C.)

Atlantis (125,000 B.C. – 23,500 B.C.)

Egypt and Maya

After Atlantis was destroyed, the more advanced souls set up shop in Egypt and Maya. These civilizations achieved great heights from about 20,000 B.C. until about 11,500 B.C. when they were overrun by malevolent races. The wise members were forced to retreat underground or into the etheric realms. The Egypt and Maya we study today were lower-vibrational remnants of the original civilizations. I go into this in depth in my book.

The Biblical Period, Sumerians, and Underground Civilizations

The Time of Jesus

The History of Mars

http://www.salrachele.com/

Sacred Geometry and the Structure of Music

Legend recounts how Orpheus was given a lyre by Apollo. By playing his lyre, Orpheus produced harmonies that joined all of Nature together in peace and joy.

Inspired by this Orphic tradition of music and science, Pythagoras of Samos conducted perhaps the world’s first physics experiment. By plucking strings of different lengths, Pythagoras discovered that sound vibrations naturally occurred in a sequence of whole tones or notes that repeat in a pattern of seven.

Like the seven naturally occurring colors of the rainbow, the octave of seven tones — indeed, all of Creation — is a singing matrix of frequencies that can be experienced as color, sound, matter, and states of consciousness.

This correlation of sound, matter, and consciousness is important. For as Stanford physicist William Tiller has proved, human consciousness imprints the space and matter of the universe. It is our intent that gives the direction and quality to Creation.

I believe that this matrix of Creation is waiting for us to sound the most harmonious vibrating chord — to sound the universe itself into a perfect, idealized form.

The Music of Atomic Shapes

The Platonic solids, basic shapes of Sacred Geometry, are five three-dimensional geometric forms of which all faces are alike. And each platonic solid represent one of the five elements of creation, as follows:

  1. Tetrahedron — Fire
  2. Cube — Earth
  3. Octahedron — Air
  4. Dodecahedron — Ether
  5. Icosahedron — Water

These five Platonic solids comprise the alchemical dance of the elements and of Creation itself. My introduction to the spiritual power of sound began with an experience of this truth.

This happened many years ago, when I was studying with Michael Helios — who is for me a reincarnated Atlantean wizard. Helios discovered the musical proportions and corresponding tone scales for each of the Platonic shapes. He even tuned his keyboard to specific frequencies in order to achieve exact proportions.

During his presentations, he would play the scales and geometries of each shape, without disclosing to his listeners which geometric shape he was playing. Participants meditated on each piece as he was playing it, and then described which of the shapes they had experienced.

The results were extraordinary. Every Platonic solid was correctly perceived, felt, and “seen” during each of the five musical meditations. As a participant myself, this was my first experience of realizing the power of musical transmission and its potential to specifically re-order creation.

This is exactly what the ancient mystics and scientists had always been telling us!

The Dodecahedron, the Universe, and the Human Form

When Michael Helios played his five compositions, I was most profoundly affected by the Dodecahedron. This shape can be seen to represent the order of the heavens and also the perfect mediation between the infinite and the finite — the sphere and the cube.

So let us look more closely at this as one example of the sacred geometric forms that permeate Creation. Through seeing the simplicity and complexity of the Dodecahedron in its relationship of shape and sound, perhaps we can intuit the rest. And through understanding our relationship to the Dodecahedron, perhaps we can begin to sense our own place within the Divine Song that is Creation.

The Dodecahedron is comprised of twelve pentagonal faces. It represents the fifth sacred element, the divine potentiality known as “ether.”

Considering that the Dodecahedron is made up of five-sided faces, it is fascinating that quantum physics researchers in the US and France have recently concluded that, based upon measurements of cosmic waves left over from the so-called “Big Bang,” the universe itself is a Dodecahedron!

human body forming a pentagramBesides the fact that there are five platonic solids and five corresponding basic elements of life, it can be shown that the entire human race is joined in these same basic sacred proportions. For the physical body, with the arms and legs spread, is overlaid by a pentagram, with the fifth point being at the top of the head and the reproductive organs at the exact center.

And each of these points also relates to the number five: five fingers at the terminus of each arm, five toes on each leg, and five openings on the face. Additionally, we each possess five senses of physical perception.

So the Golden Mean proportions of the cosmos and our body temples are closely aligned with the harmony of the musical fifth.

If we can imagine the dodecahedronal-pentagonal shape of this One Song that is the universe, together with the pentagram geometry of the human body, we find inherent in both a divine proportion and a potential for harmonic perfection. The universe and humanity ARE singing geometries. And it is we ourselves who embody the geometry of the cosmos!

Phi and the Musical Fifth

To follow this discussion, we first need to know that the Golden Mean and the Pentagram are closely related. For the angles of the five sides of a Pentagram are at a ratio of exactly 1.618 — the Golden Mean ratio, known mathematically as phi.

The fifth is the interval found in most sacred music, and has a powerful harmonizing effect on the human energy system. It is the first harmonic sounded by a plucked string, and is what gives the note its depth and beauty. Its sacred sound is the hallmark of the Gregorian chant. In fact most divinely inspired music, including some New Age music and that of indigenous cultures, is built around the musical interval of the fifth.

This music-geometry connection is well stated by Goethe, who said, “Sacred architecture is frozen music.” The same is true of the “architecture” of the human body.

It was Pythagoras who first described the fifth interval that has come to be universally recognized for its beauty. It is “an archetypal expression of harmony that demonstrates the ‘fitting together’ of microcosm and macrocosm in an inseparable whole. The fifth is a beautiful sound because it demonstrates how the universe works.”[1]

And in building the phi proportions, along with those of the other musical intervals, into the designs of cathedrals and temples, the architects also are building in the effects of the musical intervals upon which the sacred proportions are based.

These effects, immediately experienced as harmonious, powerful, and centering, can be experienced first-hand when one enters a Gothic cathedral or an ancient Egyptian temple. Being inside such a space helps us to access other dimensions of consciousness. It is the same experience that is reached through listening to sacred music.

The Circle of Fifths and the Chakras

By applying the principles of progression to the harmonics of the fifth, we come to the Circle of Fifths: a musical sequence that prefigures the harmonic relationships of the human energy system. For the Circle of Fifths delineates the chakra system in the human body.

As we know, each chakra is a spinning wheel. Here, we will also note that each chakra comprises, in both sound and color, a literal mandala of geometries.

The musical tones and colors traditionally associated with the chakras are: C (root) red, G (throat) turquoise, D (belly) orange, A (brow) indigo, E (solar plexus) yellow, B (crown) magenta, and F# (heart) green.[2]

The interweaving of the chakras that we get by applying to them the Circle of Fifths represents a more complex system than the traditional, linear progression. And it is interesting to note that in sound healing, the connections between these “chakra harmonics” reflect a strong correspondence between our issues.

For example, in the Circle of Fifths progression, the root chakra (sexuality, survival, and money) is directly connected to the throat chakra (our expression; speaking our truth). And by working with these two chakras, we find that we can heal survival issues.

The Circle of Fifths and the Fibonacci Sequence

In the Circle of Fifths we see another way in which the musical scale is related to Sacred Geometry, for the musical progression is an exact parallel to the Fibonacci sequence.

As we know, the Fibonacci sequence starts with the number 1, and proceeds by adding the two previous numbers. So the second number in the sequence also is 1, then 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, and so on. And a graph of this sequence almost exactly matches the spiral graph of the Golden Mean sequence. One is finite, the other infinite. “As above, so below.”

Fibonnaci realized that the natural branching, flowering, and spiraling forms in Nature followed the same uniform laws found in musical scales, for his sequence mathematically predicts all of the intervals that comprise the chords of music.

Note A A D F E C E C# F# C# D F
Interval root octave 4th aug. 5th 5th minor 3rd 5th 3rd 6th 3rd 4th aug. 4th
Fibonacci ratio 1/1 2/1 2/3 2/5 3/2 3/5 3/8 5/2 5/3 5/8 8/3 8/5

Sacred Geometry and the Chanting of Our World

Plato, discoverer of the “Platonic” solids, believed that music was the strongest of all life’s influences. In his treatise the Temaeus, he describes the numerical (vibrational-musical) creation of the physical universe and the soul that animates it. He called upon his students to activate the ancient shrines and sacred temples of the earth with sacred song, employing “perpetual choirs” in order to echo the harmonies of the Heavenly Choir.

Plato’s Republic describes the cosmos as being held together by eight spinning “whorls,” like a giant spinning wheel with eight feminine weavers sounding the fabric of Creation. Each of the whorls contains a planet. And on each planet is a siren who sings her particular note and emits her specific color.

The work of German astronomer and mystic Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) focused on the five Platonic solids, their harmonic ratios, and how these shapes correlated with planetary orbits and sound frequencies. He found the musical tones of individual planets, and the musical scales of planetary movements. As Stephen Hawking reports, Kepler was even able to determine that “four kinds of voice are expressed in the planets: soprano, contralto, tenor, and bass.”

In finding the music of the cosmos, Kepler showed that life forms on Earth follow the same harmonic principles as those found in the stars.

Temples of Sound

Similar knowledge has come out of the hermetic tradition, which saw its Western resurgence in the beginning of the second millennium. During this time, hundreds of Gothic Cathedrals were constructed across Europe, all inspired by this Eastern hermetic knowledge that had just been rediscovered by the mystical order known as the Knights Templar.

Excavating Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, the Knights Templar discovered vaults of hidden artifacts and scrolls that described the alchemical sciences of sacred geometry and architecture and their relationship to sound, astronomy, and genetics. Ancient sacred relics also are said to have been found, including the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, and secrets pertaining to Mary Magdalen and a Holy bloodline.[3]

Inspired by this material, the great Gothic cathedrals, including Chartres, Notre Dame, Salisbury, St.Denis, and Cluny, were designed and built using the principles of sacred geometry and harmonic acoustics.

Chanting and Millennial Shifts

Sacred music and chant is always with us. But surges in its popularity occur at the crucial millennial turning points. This was so during the beginning of the first millennium, at the inception of Christianity, and during the era of the Grail Romances, which began around 1000 AD. And now today, as we forge a new paradigm and write our “script” for the next one thousand years, chanting has again come into prominence.

The sacred architecture employed in the medieval cathedrals reflected specific acoustical properties that were conducive to the constant rounds of perpetual choirs maintained by the monks.

Author John Michell, who has researched the tradition of “perpetual choirs” in ancient Britain, reports that these choirs were maintained in at least three sites: Glastonbury, Stonehenge, and Llantwit Major in Wales. Together, the sites form the rim of a circle in the landscape, with the center at an old Druid site called Whiteleafed Oak.

Michel found that these sacred sites were equidistant from each other, and that their individual locations corresponded to sunrise points and sacred proportions.[4]

Similarly, sacred sites in other cultures also were laid out in geometric relationship to each other, and were maintained with sacred music and chant, synchronized with the seasons and cosmic cycles.

Emotion, Sound, and Form

Science is only now beginning to discover these interrelationships of sound and matter.

Launching the new science of cymatics, Swiss researcher Hans Jenny (1904-1972) conducted experiments showing that inert powders, pastes, and liquids, when animated by audible, pure tones, would form into flowing patterns that mirrored those found throughout Nature, art, and architecture. He showed that there was a correlation between sound and form — that, in effect, the matter of the universe is a physical manifestation of vibration.

And as several articles in the Spirit of Ma’at have reported, Dr. Masaru Emoto has proven over and over again, through photographing water crystals, that there is a geometrical correspondence between human thoughts and emotions and the very shape of the matter that surrounds us. Water, Emoto has shown, “treated” with love or beautiful music, undergoes molecular change into beautiful, harmonious geometrical forms. And the same happens in reverse: chaotic or “negative” thought and emotion cause the crystals of water to become unformed and unlovely.

These ideas are modern reflections of timeless principles well known to all ancient and indigenous cultures.

As Billy Yellow, a Navajo medicine man, sums it up: “Our task is to chant the world, chant the beauty. The world is a reflection of our chanting.”

http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/jan4/williams.htm

February 22 is a 222 Day

Reality is created by the numbers – it’s all geometry and follows patterns that repeat in cycles called time.

Today is George Washington’s birthday. We discussed his connection to the creation of the Masonic Program in the US linked with, the Freemasons, and Washington’s prophecies and visions, on President’s Day, this past Monday.

Secrets of the Masons Video (44:21)

The world (reality) is catching up to my theories … Consciousness is close at hand. I love when a plan and blog come together!
America’s long dance with the Mideast dates all the way back to the Founding Fathers – MSNBC – February 23, 2007

This all goes to above and below, the All Seeing Eye, George being born on 2/22 is 6, which goes to the Flower of Life, ancient Egypt and Thoth, and related files posted below.

The Human Experiment/Experience


The Grids
Body (geometric programming, holographic construct)

Mind (consciousness)

Soul (place of creation, sphere)


Oprah … “The Secret”

I want to thank everyone who email about Oprah and the film “The Secret”. Once again we find a film that reminds us how we are moving into higher consciousness, its theme – synchronicity, the ‘law of attraction’, serendipity, based on balance and understanding, Carl Jung …

Heck! I’ve been writing about synchronicity for 12 years on Crystalinks. It’s always good to see a film bring a point home or to a higher level, than say the 1990’s book “The Celestine Prophecy”. The same information gets recycled as another group of souls awakens and moves into consciousness.

Reality is inserts and busy work.

Remember what I teach … Focus on what is unfolding naturally in your life, to understand where your soul is taking you. Be the bystander and laugh at synchronicities as some are positive (functional souls) and some are negative (dysfunctional experiences required). Never play the victim, wounded soul, “Woe is me, I am a victim again” syndrome. Are your thoughts cloudy and your can’t focus to understand what I am saying, or on other things? You know the drill. Get professional help.

Never forget the complexity of it all, and yet, at the same time, it is so simplistic. In order for your soul to set up synchronicities, it shifts the grids, for you and anyone who touches your life related to a specific experience. For example … you are driving somewhere and know parking will be difficult. Your soul (consciousness at another level) moves through the grids, examining the probabilities and finding the best case scenario … the person who will leave a parking spot when you get there.

The Spider Web Effect … Ripples in the grid affect you, the other driver, and many others in the same space time – present and post. That is how experience and synchronicities occur. Often they are set up long before you get to your destination in linear time.

They could be set up by you in dream time, or any given time, as dream time realities do not cease to exist when an aspect of your consciousness returns to physical awareness. While you slumber, your brain puts the world in order New Scientist – February 22, 2007

A friend here NYC saw The Secret and told me about a tool she uses to manifest. She writes down what she wants and claims it brings manifestation. I suppose seeing your intent in writing (an old technique) reinforces the final result in your physical mind. As we are evolving into higher frequency of thought, my readers should understand that their souls call the shots and will not let them. It all goes to DNA programming and your awareness of your experiences down here.

Example: If you get laid off from a job and don’t work for a while, living off unemployment insurance and severance pay, it is because you need a break, whether you realize it at the time or not. We go to the Spider Effect, as we see how this time is spend and how it affects your grid and those in your life. At the end of the day, in the 11th hour, your soul will attract another source of income, that may work better than your old job – or a settlement comes through – or you inherit money – there are windows of opportunity. There is a reason we take breaks in our careers and jobs, generally due to being burned out. Trust you soul to manifest. Watch events in your life unfold and think about why they are happening. You will learn a lot about who you are in 2007. Next year is another set of rules, inserts and experiences.

I love watching the way the soul manifests a plan. It’s all about grid programs playing out. Think about inserts in your programming. For example, you were going to be killed, but you escaped in the nick of ‘time’ (freeze frame, stop action, time travel, deja vu, insert adjustment realignment, ‘right time’). Your grid shifts based on different factors it is programmed to experience, replaces your projection and off you go. It’s all projected illusion, holograms in space-time floating around and experiencing on many levels of awareness, simultaneously. Think about it when you have time. Never view experience with your emotional body, which is challenged, but go to the place your soul sets things up from above, that you play out in the virtual reality below. As is above, so is below … speaking of which …

Two photos labeled “As is Above, So is Below.”

Photographer, Bruce Racine created this effect.

Beijing Park, February 21, 2007

Footbridge, Soul Crosses Over Alone, Eye, Water, Tree, Mist, Vantage Point

A dense fog covering Beijing, cut visibility to a few dozen metres and paralyzed flights in and out
of the national capital on Wednesday, disrupting China’s week-long Lunar New Year celebrations.


Pisces – Vesica Pisces

The sun moved into Pisces on Sunday. As we are discussing the geometry of our grid program, we must also review Vesica Pisces part of the creational patterns of sacred geometry. The circles represent the female (ovum) and the oval the male (opening of the penis, sperm, shape of the eye … of creation, god, etc.) The letter ‘Q’ has the same connotation – sperm entering egg – The ‘Q’ Continuum of Creation.

    The vesica pisces (piscis) is a symbol made from two circles of the same radius, intersecting in such a way that the center of each circle lies on the circumference of the other. The name literally means the bladder of the fish in Latin. In the Christian tradition, it is a reference to Christ, as in ichthys. It is called a mandorla (“almond”) in India and known in the early Mesopotamian, African, and Asian civilizations.Geometry — The symbol is formed from the almond-shaped area in the overlap between the circles, as shown in black in the diagram ‹ for certain purposes also including the upper arcs as far as the edges of a rectangle whose sides coincide with the widest points of the almond (as shown in light blue in the diagram). The resulting figure looks like a stylized fish, or in the extended version like a flattened Greek letter alpha.

    Mystical and Religious Significance – It has been the subject of mystical speculation at several periods of history, perhaps first among the Pythagoreans, who considered it a holy figure. The mathematical ratio of its width (measured to the endpoints of the “body”, not including the “tail”) to its height was reportedly believed by them to be 265:153. This ratio, equal to 1.73203, was thought of as a holy number, called the measure of the fish. The geometric ratio of these dimensions is actually the square root of 3, or 1.73205… (since if you draw straight lines connecting the centers of the two circles with each other, and with the two points where the circles intersect, then you get two equilateral triangles joined along an edge, as shown in light red in the diagram). The ratio 265:153 is an approximation to the square root of 3, with the property that no better approximation can be obtained with smaller whole numbers. The number 153 appears in the Gospel of John (21:11) as the exact number of fish Jesus caused to be caught in a miraculous catch of fish, which is thought by some to be a coded reference to Pythagorean beliefs. Ichthys a symbol used by early Christians, more popularly known as the fish symbol is created by the almond shape and the light blue extension as seen in the Construction Diagram of the Vesica Pisces above.

    Uses of the shape — Other uses of the shape include that by some early peoples of the almond-shaped central area as a representation of the female genitals, and the use of a similar (horizontally-oriented) fish symbol called the Ichthys by early Christians. In Christian art, some aureolas are in the shape of a vertically oriented vesica piscis, and the seals of ecclesiastical organizations can be enclosed within a vertically oriented vesica piscis (instead of the more usual circular enclosure). The most common modern object based on the vesica piscis is the American football, which resembles the interior almond-shaped area of the vesica piscis swept about its long “axis” to produce a 3D object with rotational symmetry.

Recommended Reading:


Tube Torus

Every now and again we all have an epiphany, when we attract something, or someone, into our lives that puts more of the pieces of our puzzle together as we move into consciousness. While reviewing the 2002 file Conical Hats my bells and whistles went off, piecing together another part of the geometric design of our reality. From there I created a new file with some of the content of the original, called Tube Torus with related links in Crystalinks. I spend hours integrating and cleaning up the files that link with Tube Torus as the spiral of consciousness moves closer to the center. Posted below is this thought provoking file replete with other related links as you move along.


Seed of Life

By ratcheting the Seed of Life one obtains the basic structure of the Tube Torus. The Tube Torus is basic in the study of Vortex forms. This first simple study of a one dimensional form leads to the understanding of multidimensional vortex forms.

View of the Tube Torus from the side and nested.

Slinky Effect
Views of the Tube Torus as the

polar grid in other positions.

Golden Ratio/Mean Spiral

from two different calculations

If you copy the Golden Mean Spiral several times and use the same center point, then place it in a circle, you obtain another means of viewing a vortex. This can also be done with any calculable spiral such as the Fibonacci spiral.

View of the same vortex

from an angle with reflection.

Looking at the Golden Mean

from the side.
Zero Point
As is Above, So is Below


Harmonics of Sound

View of the polar grid derived from the Flower of Life containing the same Golden Mean Spiral. As you contemplate this image, the beginning of the study of Character Math seems to appear. This is a one dimensional look at the polar grid which is actually 3 dimensional. The study of music and how it pertains to the Flower of Life and the polar grid, yields harmonic calculations which describe other proportional properties in Sacred Geometry. Phi Harmonics research continues at San Graal School of Sacred Geometry. There are links on the front page to other articles and downloadable music files which are pertinent to the study of The Language of Light, according to Phi and the Vibration of our Universe.

Calculating the polar grid from a different perspective we get the harmonics of music equaling the twelfth root of two, which is the standard for tuning harmonics as we know them



12 Spiraling Cones Around 1 – Creation


Flower of Life


Sacred Geometry


Metatron’s Cube


Zero Point


Conical Hats


The Donut Effect


Rods and Cones
All Seeing Eye

The Court Jester and the Fleur de Lis (Flower of Life)


Hermes Trismegistus

The Emerald Tablets of Thoth
As is Above, So is Below

Gordian Knot


Eclipse of Time and Consciousness

DEWEY B. LARSON: THE COLLECTED WORKS

photo of D.B. LarsonDewey B. Larson (1898-1990) was an American engineer and the originator of the Reciprocal System of Theory, a comprehensive theoretical framework capable of explaining all physical phenomena from subatomic particles to galactic clusters. In this general physical theory space and time are simply the two reciprocal aspects of the sole constituent of the universe–motion. For more background information on the origin of Larson’s discoveries, see Interview with D. B. Larson taped at Salt Lake City in 1984. This site covers the entire scope of Larson’s scientific writings, including his exploration of economics and metaphysics.

Physical Science

The Structure of the Physical Universe
The original groundbreaking publication wherein the Reciprocal System of Physical Theory was presented for the first time.

The Case Against the Nuclear Atom
“A rude and outspoken book.”

Beyond Newton
“…Recommended to anyone who thinks the subject of gravitation and general relativity was opened and closed by Einstein.”

New Light on Space and Time
A bird’s eye view of the theory and its ramifications.

The Neglected Facts of Science
Explores the implications for physical science of the observed existence of scalar motion.

Quasars and Pulsars
Explains the most violent phenomena in the universe.

Nothing but Motion
The first volume of the revised edition of
The Structure of the Physical Universe, developing the basic principles and relations.

Basic Properties of Matter
The second volume of the revised edition of
The Structure of the Physical Universe, applying the theory to the structure and behavior of matter, electricity and magnetism.

The Universe of Motion
The third volume of the revised edition of
The Structure of the Physical Universe, applying the theory to astronomy.

The Liquid State Papers
A series of privately circulated papers on the liquid state of matter.

The Dewey B. Larson Correspondence
Larson’s scientific correspondence, providing many informative sidelights on the development of the theory and the personality of its author.

The Dewey B. Larson Lectures
Transcripts and digitized recordings of Larson’s lectures.

The Collected Essays of Dewey B. Larson
Larson’s articles in Reciprocity and other publications, as well as unpublished essays.

Metaphysics

Beyond Space and Time
A scientific excursion into the largely unexplored territory of metaphysics.

Economic Science

The Road to Full Employment
The scientific answer to the number one economic problem.

The Road to Permanent Prosperity
A theoretical explanation of the business cycle and the means to overcome it.

http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/dbl/

The Universe as a Hologram

Does Objective Reality Exist, or is the Universe a Phantasm?

In 1982 a remarkable event took place. At the University of Paris a research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th century. You did not hear about it on the evening news. In fact, unless you are in the habit of reading scientific journals you probably have never even heard Aspect’s name, though there are some who believe his discovery may change the face of science.

Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn’t matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.

Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein’s long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain away Aspect’s findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations.

University of London physicist David Bohm, for example, believes Aspect’s findings imply that objective reality does not exist, that despite its apparent solidity the universe is at heart a phantasm, a gigantic and splendidly detailed hologram.

To understand why Bohm makes this startling assertion, one must first understand a little about holograms. A hologram is a three- dimensional photograph made with the aid of a laser. To make a hologram, the object to be photographed is first bathed in the light of a laser beam. Then a second laser beam is bounced off the reflected light of the first and the resulting interference pattern (the area where the two laser beams commingle) is captured on film. When the film is developed, it looks like a meaningless swirl of light and dark lines. But as soon as the developed film is illuminated by another laser beam, a three-dimensional image of the original object appears. The three-dimensionality of such images is not the only remarkable characteristic of holograms. If a hologram of a rose is cut in half and then illuminated by a laser, each half will still be found to contain the entire image of the rose. Indeed, even if the halves are divided again, each snippet of film will always be found to contain a smaller but intact version of the original image. Unlike normal photographs, every part of a hologram contains all the information possessed by the whole. The “whole in every part” nature of a hologram provides us with an entirely new way of understanding organization and order. For most of its history, Western science has labored under the bias that the best way to understand a physical phenomenon, whether a frog or an atom, is to dissect it and study its respective parts.

A hologram teaches us that some things in the universe may not lend themselves to this approach. If we try to take apart something constructed holographically, we will not get the pieces of which it is made, we will only get smaller wholes. This insight suggested to Bohm another way of understanding Aspect’s discovery. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness is an illusion. He argues that at some deeper level of reality such particles are not individual entities, but are actually extensions of the same fundamental something.

To enable people to better visualize what he means, Bohm offers the following illustration.
Imagine an aquarium containing a fish. Imagine also that you are unable to see the aquarium directly and your knowledge about it and what it contains comes from two television cameras, one directed at the aquarium’s front and the other directed at its side. As you stare at the two television monitors, you might assume that the fish on each of the screens are separate entities. After all, because the cameras are set at different angles, each of the images will be slightly different. But as you continue to watch the two fish, you will eventually become aware that there is a certain relationship between them. When one turns, the other also makes a slightly different but corresponding turn; when one faces the front, the other always faces toward the side. If you remain unaware of the full scope of the situation, you might even conclude that the fish must be instantaneously communicating with one another, but this is clearly not the case.

This, says Bohm, is precisely what is going on between the subatomic particles in Aspect’s experiment. According to Bohm, the apparent faster-than-light connection between subatomic particles is really telling us that there is a deeper level of reality we are not privy to, a more complex dimension beyond our own that is analogous to the aquarium. And, he adds, we view objects such as subatomic particles as separate from one another because we are seeing only a portion of their reality.

Such particles are not separate “parts”, but facets of a deeper and more underlying unity that is ultimately as holographic and indivisible as the previously mentioned rose. And since everything in physical reality is comprised of these “eidolons”, the universe is itself a projection, a hologram.

In addition to its phantomlike nature, such a universe would possess other rather startling features. If the apparent separateness of subatomic particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all things in the universe are infinitely interconnected. The electrons in a carbon atom in the human brain are connected to the subatomic particles that comprise every salmon that swims, every heart that beats, and every star that shimmers in the sky. Everything interpenetrates everything, and although human nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of necessity artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web.

In a holographic universe, even time and space could no longer be viewed as fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break down in a universe in which nothing is truly separate from anything else, time and three-dimensional space, like the images of the fish on the TV monitors, would also have to be viewed as projections of this deeper order. At its deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. This suggests that given the proper tools it might even be possible to someday reach into the superholographic level of reality and pluck out scenes from the long-forgotten past. What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question. Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the matrix that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it contains every subatomic particle that has been or will be — every configuration of matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from blue whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse of “All That Is.”

Although Bohm concedes that we have no way of knowing what else might lie hidden in the superhologram, he does venture to say that we have no reason to assume it does not contain more. Or as he puts it, perhaps the superholographic level of reality is a “mere stage” beyond which lies “an infinity of further development”. Bohm is not the only researcher who has found evidence that the universe is a hologram. Working independently in the field of brain research, Standford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has also become persuaded of the holographic nature of reality.

Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how and where memories are stored in the brain. For decades numerous studies have shown that rather than being confined to a specific location, memories are dispersed throughout the brain.

In a series of landmark experiments in the 1920s, brain scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter what portion of a rat’s brain he removed he was unable to eradicate its memory of how to perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only problem was that no one was able to come up with a mechanism that might explain this curious “whole in every part” nature of memory storage. Then in the 1960s Pribram encountered the concept of holography and realized he had found the explanation brain scientists had been looking for. Pribram believes memories are encoded not in neurons, or small groupings of neurons, but in patterns of nerve impulses that crisscross the entire brain in the same way that patterns of laser light interference crisscross the entire area of a piece of film containing a holographic image. In other words, Pribram believes the brain is itself a hologram. Pribram’s theory also explains how the human brain can store so many memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the human brain has the capacity to memorize something on the order of 10 billion bits of information during the average human lifetime (or roughly the same amount of information contained in five sets of the Encyclopaedia Britannica).

Similarly, it has been discovered that in addition to their other capabilities, holograms possess an astounding capacity for information storage–simply by changing the angle at which the two lasers strike a piece of photographic film, it is possible to record many different images on the same surface. It has been demonstrated that one cubic centimeter of film can hold as many as 10 billion bits of information. Our uncanny ability to quickly retrieve whatever information we need from the enormous store of our memories becomes more understandable if the brain functions according to holographic principles. If a friend asks you to tell him what comes to mind when he says the word “zebra”, you do not have to clumsily sort back through some gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file to arrive at an answer. Instead, associations like “striped”, “horselike”, and “animal native to Africa” all pop into your head instantly. Indeed, one of the most amazing things about the human thinking process is that every piece of information seems instantly cross- correlated with every other piece of information–another feature intrinsic to the hologram. Because every portion of a hologram is infinitely interconnected with every other portion, it is perhaps nature’s supreme example of a cross-correlated system.

The storage of memory is not the only neurophysiological puzzle that becomes more tractable in light of Pribram’s holographic model of the brain. Another is how the brain is able to translate the avalanche of frequencies it receives via the senses (light frequencies, sound frequencies, and so on) into the concrete world of our perceptions. Encoding and decoding frequencies is precisely what a hologram does best. Just as a hologram functions as a sort of lens, a translating device able to convert an apparently meaningless blur of frequencies into a coherent image, Pribram believes the brain also comprises a lens and uses holographic principles to mathematically convert the frequencies it receives through the senses into the inner world of our perceptions. An impressive body of evidence suggests that the brain uses holographic principles to perform its operations. Pribram’s theory, in fact, has gained increasing support among neurophysiologists.

Argentinian-Italian researcher Hugo Zucarelli recently extended the holographic model into the world of acoustic phenomena. Puzzled by the fact that humans can locate the source of sounds without moving their heads, even if they only possess hearing in one ear, Zucarelli discovered that holographic principles can explain this ability. Zucarelli has also developed the technology of holophonic sound, a recording technique able to reproduce acoustic situations with an almost uncanny realism.

Pribram’s belief that our brains mathematically construct “hard” reality by relying on input from a frequency domain has also received a good deal of experimental support. It has been found that each of our senses is sensitive to a much broader range of frequencies than was previously suspected. Researchers have discovered, for instance, that our visual systems are sensitive to sound frequencies, that our sense of smell is in part dependent on what are now called “osmic frequencies”, and that even the cells in our bodies are sensitive to a broad range of frequencies. Such findings suggest that it is only in the holographic domain of consciousness that such frequencies are sorted out and divided up into conventional perceptions. But the most mind-boggling aspect of Pribram’s holographic model of the brain is what happens when it is put together with Bohm’s theory. For if the concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what is “there” is actually a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain is also a hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes of objective reality?

Put quite simply, it ceases to exist. As the religions of the East have long upheld, the material world is Maya, an illusion, and although we may think we are physical beings moving through a physical world, this too is an illusion.

We are really “receivers” floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. This striking new picture of reality, the synthesis of Bohm and Pribram’s views, has come to be called the holographic paradigm, and although many scientists have greeted it with skepticism, it has galvanized others. A small but growing group of researchers believe it may be the most accurate model of reality science has arrived at thus far. More than that, some believe it may solve some mysteries that have never before been explainable by science and even establish the paranormal as a part of nature.

Numerous researchers, including Bohm and Pribram, have noted that many para-psychological phenomena become much more understandable in terms of the holographic paradigm. In a universe in which individual brains are actually indivisible portions of the greater hologram and everything is infinitely interconnected, telepathy may merely be the accessing of the holographic level. It is obviously much easier to understand how information can travel from the mind of individual ‘A’ to that of individual ‘B’ at a far distance point and helps to understand a number of unsolved puzzles in psychology. In particular, Grof feels the holographic paradigm offers a model for understanding many of the baffling phenomena experienced by individuals during altered states of consciousness.

In the 1950s, while conducting research into the beliefs of LSD as a psychotherapeutic tool, Grof had one female patient who suddenly became convinced she had assumed the identity of a female of a species of prehistoric reptile. During the course of her hallucination, she not only gave a richly detailed description of what it felt like to be encapsuled in such a form, but noted that the portion of the male of the species’s anatomy was a patch of colored scales on the side of its head. What was startling to Grof was that although the woman had no prior knowledge about such things, a conversation with a zoologist later confirmed that in certain species of reptiles colored areas on the head do indeed play an important role as triggers of sexual arousal. The woman’s experience was not unique. During the course of his research, Grof encountered examples of patients regressing and identifying with virtually every species on the evolutionary tree (research findings which helped influence the man-into-ape scene in the movie Altered States). Moreover, he found that such experiences frequently contained obscure zoological details which turned out to be accurate. Regressions into the animal kingdom were not the only puzzling psychological phenomena Grof encountered. He also had patients who appeared to tap into some sort of collective or racial unconscious. Individuals with little or no education suddenly gave detailed descriptions of Zoroastrian funerary practices and scenes from Hindu mythology. In other categories of experience, individuals gave persuasive accounts of out-of-body journeys, of precognitive glimpses of the future, of regressions into apparent past-life incarnations.

In later research, Grof found the same range of phenomena manifested in therapy sessions which did not involve the use of drugs. Because the common element in such experiences appeared to be the transcending of an individual’s consciousness beyond the usual boundaries of ego and/or limitations of space and time, Grof called such manifestations “transpersonal experiences”, and in the late ’60s he helped found a branch of psychology called “transpersonal psychology” devoted entirely to their study. Although Grof’s newly founded Association of Transpersonal Psychology garnered a rapidly growing group of like-minded professionals and has become a respected branch of psychology, for years neither Grof or any of his colleagues were able to offer a mechanism for explaining the bizarre psychological phenomena they were witnessing. But that has changed with the advent of the holographic paradigm. As Grof recently noted, if the mind is actually part of a continuum, a labyrinth that is connected not only to every other mind that exists or has existed, but to every atom, organism, and region in the vastness of space and time itself, the fact that it is able to occasionally make forays into the labyrinth and have transpersonal experiences no longer seems so strange.

The holographic prardigm also has implications for so-called hard sciences like biology. Keith Floyd, a psychologist at Virginia Intermont College, has pointed out that if the concreteness of reality is but a holographic illusion, it would no longer be true to say the brain produces consciousness. Rather, it is consciousness that creates the appearance of the brain — as well as the body and everything else around us we interpret as physical. Such a turnabout in the way we view biological structures has caused researchers to point out that medicine and our understanding of the healing process could also be transformed by the holographic paradigm. If the apparent physical structure of the body is but a holographic projection of consciousness, it becomes clear that each of us is much more responsible for our health than current medical wisdom allows. What we now view as miraculous remissions of disease may actually be due to changes in consciousness which in turn effect changes in the hologram of the body.

Similarly, controversial new healing techniques such as visualization may work so well because in the holographic domain of thought images are ultimately as real as “reality”. Even visions and experiences involving “non-ordinary” reality become explainable under the holographic paradigm. In his book “Gifts of Unknown Things,” biologist Lyall Watson discribes his encounter with an Indonesian shaman woman who, by performing a ritual dance, was able to make an entire grove of trees instantly vanish into thin air. Watson relates that as he and another astonished onlooker continued to watch the woman, she caused the trees to reappear, then “click” off again and on again several times in succession. Although current scientific understanding is incapable of explaining such events, experiences like this become more tenable if “hard” reality is only a holographic projection. Perhaps we agree on what is “there” or “not there” because what we call consensus reality is formulated and ratified at the level of the human unconscious at which all minds are infinitely interconnected.

If this is true, it is the most profound implication of the holographic paradigm of all, for it means that experiences such as Watson’s are not commonplace only because we have not programmed our minds with the beliefs that would make them so. In a holographic universe there are no limits to the extent to which we can alter the fabric of reality. What we perceive as reality is only a canvas waiting for us to draw upon it any picture we want. Anything is possible, from bending spoons with the power of the mind to the phantasmagoric events experienced by Castaneda during his encounters with the Yaqui brujo don Juan, for magic is our birthright, no more or less miraculous than our ability to compute the reality we want when we are in our dreams. Indeed, even our most fundamental notions about reality become suspect, for in a holographic universe, as Pribram has pointed out, even random events would have to be seen as based on holographic principles and therefore determined. Synchronicities or meaningful coincidences suddenly makes sense, and everything in reality would have to be seen as a metaphor, for even the most haphazard events would express some underlying symmetry. Whether Bohm and Pribram’s holographic paradigm becomes accepted in science or dies an ignoble death remains to be seen, but it is safe to say that it has already had an influence on the thinking of many scientists. And even if it is found that the holographic model does not provide the best explanation for the instantaneous communications that seem to be passing back and forth between subatomic particles, at the very least, as noted by Basil Hiley, a physicist at Birbeck College in London, Aspect’s findings “indicate that we must be prepared to consider radically new views of reality”.

Planet Hypothesis & Hyperdimensional Physics

For some time, we have been asked to provide an overview of a subject intimately connected with — but not dependent upon — the confirmation of “intelligent ruins at Cydonia,” on Mars:

The arcane subject of “Hyperdimensional Physics.”

Unknown to most current physicists and students of science (if not the general media and public), the beginnings of modern physics launched over 100 years ago by the so-called “giants” — Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin, Faraday, Maxwell and many others — laid a full and rich tradition in this currently little-known field: the open, heatedly debated scientific and philosophical premise that three-dimensional reality is only a subset of a series of higher, hyperspatial, additional dimensions, which control not only the physics of our very existence, from stars to galaxies to life itself … but potentially, through time-variable changes in its foundations–

Dramatic coming changes in our lives.

This bold theoretical and experimental era, at the very dawn of science as we know it, came to an abrupt end at the close of the 19th Century. That was when our currently accepted (and very different) view of “physics” — everything from the “Big Bang” Expanding Universe Cosmology, to Relativistic limitations imposed by “flat” space and non-simultaneous time, complicated by a non-intuitive “Quantum Mechanics” of suddenly uncertain atomic “realities” — all took a very different turn … from where they had been headed. Imagine our surprise, when — as part of our Enterprise Mission effort to verify the existence of intelligently-created ruins at “Cydonia” — we suddenly realized we might have stumbled across the geometry of this same 19th Century, pre-Relativity “hyperdimensional physics”–

But encoded on a completely separate world!

Even more startling: this “lost science” was — somehow –geometrically memorialized on the same planet … the planet Mars … that may have seen its “end” as a direct result of this same physics …

According to the former Chief of the Celestial Mechanics Branch of the U.S. Naval Observatory, astronomer Thomas Van Flandern, Mars may once having been the satellite of a former major 10th planet of the solar system, that once orbited between current Jupiter and Mars. Sixty-five million years ago, for some currently unknown reason (according to Van Flandern’s 25-year-old theory ) — that planet suddenly exploded–

Releasing Mars into its currently “anomalously elliptical” orbit of the Sun …

With NASA’s recent announcement of the potential discovery of the first “extrasolar, Jovian-class planet” physically detected beyond the confines of our solar system, the timing seemed particularly appropriate to update our original description of “hyperdimensional physics” at the United Nations, in 1992. And to call for some unique tests of this hypothesis, now that extensive new NASA observations of “the planet” are being planned for the next few months.

It is particularly ironic that these same tests could also provide striking new evidence supporting Van Flandern’s 25 year-old “exploding planet hypothesis” …


On May 28, 1998, NASA held the latest in a recent series of unprecedented news conferences in Washington D.C.; the announcement of the first direct detection (as opposed to inferences deduced from “stellar wobbles”) of a possible planet located beyond our local solar system. The discoverer — Dr. Susan Terebey, founder of the “Extrasolar Research Corporation” — serendipitiously located the potential planet while using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the newly-installed “NICMOS” Camera last year to study newly-forming stars.

Officially termed “TMR-1C,” at the announcement NASA press conference Dr. Terebey described her at first slow realization of the uniqueness and potential importance of this “find”; ultimately her attention was drawn to a mere “pinprick of infrared light” in close association (on the Hubble “NICMOS” image — ) with two much brighter stars. Immersed in a dense cloud of interstellar dust, this faint, solitary object — the only other IR source (besides the stars themselves) visible against the dust — was strategically located at the precise end of a long, slender filament of light. Terebey discovered, upon preliminary measurement, that this “filament” extended over a 100 billion miles … directly connecting the “pinprick” with the twin, newborn parent suns.

Several months into her analysis, Terebey reached the tentative conclusion that this tiny “IR speck” was most likely the first Hubble image (if not any image!) of a newborn, runaway giant planet — “recently” ejected from a prior orbit of the nearby stars themselves. From the faint infrared luminosity of this isolated object and contemporary models of planetary formation, Terebey estimated that its mass has to be only “2 to 3 times Jupiter’s.” The “filament,” she theorized, is most likely a “tunnel” literally bored through the dense cloud of surrounding gas and dust by the passage of the ejected planet itself — a tunnel that, acting like a “lightpipe,” is scattering infrared energy down its entire 130 billion-mile length from the nearby stars themselves.

Because Taurus (the celestial region in which these remarkable objects are located) is now behind the Sun as seen from Earth, it will be several months before Hubble can be used to acquire additional data on the “planet.” There are also plans to enlist major ground-based telescopes in this campaign. What is critically needed is spectrascopic data on this object; if it is not merely a misidentified small star (such as a red dwarf, drastically dimmed by the copious dust still swirling in the vicinity of the nearby brighter stars), but is in fact a cooling planet, this will be instantly apparent from its spectrum.

Which brings us to the unique hyperdimensional possibilities this discovery has now presented.


Astrophysical discovery of “glowing planets” — planetary bodies which shine in the infrared via internal energy sources, not just by reflected light — stems from completely unexpected ground-based telescopic observations of this solar system, beginning in the mid-1960’s: the startling detection of “anomalous internal infrared radiation” coming from the planet Jupiter. Later Pioneer and Voyager insitu spacecraft observations across the 70s and 80s added the other “giant planets,” Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, to the list of solar system worlds that — somehow, without internal nuclear fusion processes, like stars — still manage to radiate more energy out into space than they receive directly from the Sun.

After much initial debate, the conventional understanding of these anomalous “infrared excesses” eventually settled on three possible internal sources: 1) left-over “primordial heat” from the literal formation of the planet; 2) heating caused by eventual internal separation of light elements in so-called “gas giant” planets (helium from hydrogen), releasing potential energy as the helium falls further toward the center of the planet (a form of ultra-slow, “continued gravitational contraction”); and 3), anomalous energy release due to excess radioactive decay of heavy element concentrations located within gas giant rocky cores.

Of the three current explanations for these “energy anomalies,” only the first applies to Jupiter … because of its mass — 318 times the Earth’s; a planet of that minimum mass is required (in the model) if it’s to retain significant thermal energy across the immense lifetime of the solar system … almost 5 billion years since the planet’s formation … and still be able to radiate observable heat. And, as can be seen from this diagram, the current ratio of absorbed solar energy to emitted 5-billion-year-old internal Jovian energy is still almost two to one!

After the Voyager fly-bys of the 1980’s, the second “internal heat” proposal — the “helium drip model” — was favored for the observed heat excess in the Saturn situation. But, because of their relatively light masses (less than 30 times the Earth’s), only the third possibility — massive internal radioactive decay — has been seriously attempted as an explanation for Uranus’ and Neptune’s more puzzling “anomalous infrared emissions.”

There are, however, serious problems with all of these “conventional” explanations — particularly after these spacecraft flybys, for all planets less massive than Jupiter.

For instance, during the Voyager encounters of Uranus and Neptune, spacecraft instruments detected a barely measurable (but significant) “infrared excess” (as opposed to merely infrared re-emission of absorbed solar energy) for Uranus of about “1 to 1.14″; whereas for Neptune (essentially its planetary “twin”) the ratio of internal heat to intercepted sunlight was a striking “three to one!”

However, simultaneous “doppler tracking” gravity measurements conducted during the fly-bys (looking for anomalous trajectory changes to the spacecraft motion, caused by gravitational effects from increased percentages of heavy radioactive elements in the cores of Uranus and Neptune) detected no anomalous central concentrations in either planet … necessary, if the excess observed IR radiation is in fact caused by “excessive internal radioactive element concentrations.”

Even more perplexing, Uranus has a pronounced axial tilt (“obliquity” is the technical term) compared to all the other planets of the solar system — some 98 degrees to the plane of its orbit of the Sun; Neptune’s is much more “normal”: about 30 degrees. [For comparison, Earth's obliquity is about 23.5 degrees]. One recently proposed alternative to the “internal radioactivity model” is “the recent collision model”: that Uranus — somehow, long after its formation — suffered a massive impact with another major object, perhaps an errant moon … This, according to the theorists, in addition to accounting for the current “tipped over situation” of the planet, would have also added a significant amount of geologically “recent” internal energy to Uranus, driving up internal temperatures by equivalent amounts. This model argues that these resulting elevated temperatures in Uranus, derived from a massive “cosmic collision,” could thus account for Uranus’ current “infrared excess,” as observed by Voyager in 1986.

There is only one problem with these ideas: the “excess radioactivity theory,” and the “cosmic collision model” are both apparently dead wrong.

Uranus, with no apparent core concentration of “heavy radioactive elements” (so said Voyager), yet the one solar system planet with an axial “tilt” consistent with a major interplanetary collision — is barely radiating “over unity” at its distance from the Sun (“over unity”= more energy coming out than is going in); Neptune — essentially Uranus’ twin — by striking contrast, and with a perfectly “normal” obliquity, is radiating almost three times more energy “out” than it’s getting from the Sun. When these two planets are “normalized” (i.e., when their differing distances from the Sun are taken into account), their absolute internal “over unity” energy emissions, in fact, are just about the same.

So, based on these “local” solar system observations, there’s apparently something drastically wrong with current astrophysical theories relating to “anomalous internal planetary energy resources” … the same theories that Dr. Susan Terebey and NASA are now relying on to tell them (and us) both the age and mass of her newly-discovered “runaway planet.”

Enter Hyperdimensional Physics.


The cornerstone of the hyperdimensional model (as applied to the problem of “unexplained” astrophysical energy sources) is that historically, there is a perfectly natural explanation for such “anomalous energy” appearing in celestial bodies … which, unfortunately, hasn’t been seriously considered by Science for over 100 years:

The existence of unseen hyperspatial realities … that, through information transfer between dimensions, are the literal “foundation substrate” maintaining the reality of everything in this dimension.

The mathematical and physical parameters required for such “information/energy gating” into this spatial dimension from potential “n-dimensions” were primarily founded in the pioneering work of several 19th Century founders of modern mathematics and physics: among these, German mathematician Georg Riemann; Scottish physicist Sir William Thompson (who would eventually be Knighted by the British Crown as “Baron Kelvin of Largs” for his scientific and technological contributions); Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell; and British mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton.

In 1867 Thompson, following decades of inquiry into the fundamental properties of both matter and the space between, proposed a radical new explanation for the most fundamental properties of solid objects — the existence of “the vortex atom.” This was in direct contradiction to then prevailing 19th Century theories of matter, in which atoms were still viewed as infinitesimal “small, hard bodies [as] imagined by [the Roman poet] Lucretius, and endorsed by Newton …” Thompson’s “vortex atoms” were envisioned, instead, as tiny, self-sustaining “whirlpools” in the so-called “aether” — which Thompson and his 19th Century contemporaries increasingly believed extended throughout the Universe as an all-pervasive, incompressible fluid.

Even as Thompson published his revolutionary model for the atom, Maxwell, building on Thompson’s earlier explorations of the underlying properties of this “aetheric fluid,” was well on the way to devising a highly successful “mechanical” vortex model of the “incompressible aether” itself, in which Thompson’s vortex atom could live — a model derived in part from the laboratory-observed elastic and dynamical properties of solids. Ultimately, in 1873, he would succeed in uniting a couple hundred years of electrical and magnetic scientific observations into a comprehensive, overarching electromagnetic theory of light vibrations … carried across space by this “incompressible and highly stressed universal aetheric fluid …”

Maxwell’s mathematical basis for his triumphant unification of these two great mystery forces of 19th Century physics were “quaternions” — a term invented (adopted would be a more precise description) in the 1840s by mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton, for “an ordered pair of complex numbers” (quaternion = four). Complex numbers themselves, according to Hamilton’s clarifications of long-mysterious terms such as “imaginary” and “real” numbers utilized in earlier definitions, were nothing more than “pairs of real numbers which are added or multiplied according to certain formal rules.” In 1897, A.S. Hathaway formally extended Hamilton’s ideas regarding quaternions as “sets of four real numbers” to the idea of four spatial dimensions, in a paper entitled “Quaternions as numbers of four-dimensional space,” published in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society [4 (1887), 54-7].

It is obvious from Maxwell’s own writings that, even before Hathaway’s formalization, his choice of quaternions as mathematical operators for his electromagnetic theory was based on his belief that three-dimensional physical phenomena (including even perhaps the basis of human consciousness itself) are dependent upon higher dimensional realities. For, in honor of another great mathematician of the time, multi-dimensional geometer Arthur Cayley, Maxwell wrote …

“Oh WRETCHED race of men, to space confined!
What honour can ye pay to him, whose mind
To that which lies beyond hath penetrated?
The symbols he hath formed shall sound his praise,
And lead him on through unimagined ways
To conquests new, in worlds not yet created.

First, ye Determinants! In ordered row
And massive column ranged, before him go,
To form a phalanx for his safe protection.
Ye powers of the nth roots of – 1!
Around his head in ceaseless* cycles run,
As unembodied spirits of direction.

And you, ye undevelopable scrolls!
Above the host wave your emblazoned rolls,
Ruled for the record of his bright inventions.
Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines
Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines-
The seal of Solomon in three dimensions.


March on, symbolic host! With step sublime,
Up to the flaming bounds of Space and Time!
There pause, until by Dickenson depicted,
In two dimensions, we the form may trace
Of him whose soul, too large for vulgar space,
In n dimensions flourished unrestricted.”

– James Clerk Maxwell
To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund — 1887

Confirmation that Maxwell’s “hyper-dimensional” inquiries extended far beyond “mere” physical interactions can be seen from another of his “unknown” poems …

“My soul is an entangled knot,
Upon a liquid vortex wrought
By Intellect in the Unseen residing.
And thine doth like a convict sit,

With marlinspike untwisting it,
Only to find its knottiness abiding;
Since all the tool for its untying
In four-dimensional space are lying.”

In another work (“The Aether,” 1876), Maxwell underscored the “ultimate” significance of these inquiries …

“Whether this vast homogeneous expanse of isotropic matter [the aether] is fitted not only to be a medium of physical Interaction between distant bodies, and to fulfill other physical functions of which, perhaps we have as yet no conception, but also as the authors of The Unseen Universe seem to suggest, to constitute the material organism of beings excercising functions of life and mind as high or higher than ours are at resent, is a question far transcending the limits of physical speculation …”

This startling connection — between Maxwell’s demonstrably deep interest in questions “hyperdimensional,” including his direct homage to one of his scientific mentors’, Arthur Cayley’s hyperdimensional geometry (the “27 lines on the general cubic surface” problem — see diagram, right); and our rediscovery over a century later of that same geometry … at a place called “Cydonia” … on Mars — is nothing short of astonishing. But, if you doubt such a compelling connection, just reread those key lines–

“…Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines, Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines- The seal of Solomon in three dimensions [emphasis added] ..”

Which, of course, are nothing less than the geometrical and mathematical underpinnings of the infamous “circumscribed tetrahedral latitude” memoralized all over Cydonia19.5 degrees, the identical, hyper-dimensional quaternion geometry whose physical effects (see below) we have now rediscovered all across the solar system … and beyond!

In a tragedy for science (if not for society in general) whose outlines we are only now beginning to appreciate, after Maxwell’s death, two other 19th Century “mathematical physicists” — Oliver Heaviside and William Gibbs — “streamlined” Maxwell’s original equations down to four simple (if woefully incomplete!) expressions. Because Heaviside openly felt the quaternions were “an abomination” — never fully understanding the linkage between the critical scalar and vector components in Maxwell’s use of them to describe the potentials of empty space (“apples and oranges,” he termed them) — he eliminated over 200 quaternions from Maxwell’s original theory in his attempted “simplification.”

[Oliver Heaviside, described by Scientific American (Sept. 1950) as “self-taught and … never connected with any university … had [however] a remarkable and inexplicable ability (which was possessed also by Newton and Laplace …) to arrive at mathematical results of considerable complexity without going through any conscious process of proof …” According to other observers, Heaviside actually felt that Maxwell’s use of quaternions and their description of the “potentials” of space was “… mystical, and should be murdered from the theory …” which — by drastically editing Maxwell’s original work after the latter’s untimely death (from cancer), excising the scalar component of the quaternions and eliminating the hyperspatial characteristics of the directional (vector) components — Oliver Heaviside effectively accomplished singlehanded.]

This means, of course, that the four surviving “classic” Maxwell’s Equations — which appear in every electrical and physics text the world over, as the underpinnings of all 20th Century electrical and electromagnetic engineering, from radio to radar, from television to computer science, if not inclusive of every “hard” science from physics to chemistry to astrophysics that deals with electromagnetic radiative processes — never appeared in any original Maxwell’ paper or treatise! They are, in fact–

“Heaviside’s equations!”

Lest anyone doubt this is the case, they merely have to read a highly revealing paper on the subject by another renowned British mathematical physicist of this century, Sir Edmund Whittaker, titled simply “Oliver Heaviside” (Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1928-29, p.202); or, another overview of Heaviside by Paul J. Nahin, “Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude” (IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.9, note 3.).

The end result was that physics lost its promising theoretical beginnings to becoming truly “hyperdimensional” physics … over a century ago … and all that that implies.


Georg Bernard Riemann mathematically initiated the 19th Century scientific community (if not the rest of Victorian society) into the “unsettling” idea of “hyperspace,” on June 10, 1854. In a seminal presentation made at the University of Gottinggen in Germany, Riemann put forth the first mathematical description of the possibility of “higher, unseen dimensions …” under the deceptively simple title: “On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry.”

Riemann’s paper was a fundamental assault on the 2000-year old assumptions of “Euclidian Geometry” — the ordered, rectilinear laws of “ordinary” three dimensional reality. In its place, Riemann proposed a four-dimensional reality (of which our 3-D reality was merely a “subset”), in which the geometric rules were radically different, but also internally self-consistent. Even more radical: Riemann proposed that the basic laws of nature in 3-space, the three mysterious forces then known to physics — electrostatics, magnetism and gravity — were all fundamentally united in 4-space, and merely “looked different” because of the resulting “crumpled geometry” of our three-dimensional reality …

In terms of actual physics, Riemann was suggesting something clearly revolutionary: a major break with Newton’s “force creates action-at-a-distance” theories of the time, which had been proposed to explain the “magical” properties of magnetic and electrical attraction and repulsion, gravitationally-curved motions of planets … and falling apples, for over 200 years; in place of Newton, Riemann was proposing that such “apparent forces'” are a direct result of objects moving through 3-space “geometry” … distorted by the intruding geometry of “4-space!”

It is clear that Maxwell and other “giants” of 19th Century physics (Kelvin, for one), as well as an entire contemporary generation of 19th Century mathematicians (like Cayle, Tait, etc.) , took Riemann’s ideas very much to heart; Maxwell’s original selection of 4-space quaternions as the mathematical operators for his force equations and descriptions of electrical and magnetic interaction, clearly demonstrate his belief in Riemann’s approach; and, his surprising literary excursions into poetry — vividly extolling the implications of “higher-dimensional realities” … including musings on their relationship to the ultimate origin of the human soul (above) — emphatically confirm this outlook.

So, how can modern “hyperdimensional physicists” — like Michio Kaku, at City College of the City University of New York — representative of an entirely new generation of physical scientists now reexamining these century-old implications of “hyperspatial geometries” for generating the basic laws of Reality itself, almost casually claim:

“… In retrospect, Riemann’s famous lecture was popularized to a wide audience via mystics, philosophers and artists, but did little to further our understanding of nature … First, there was no attempt to use hyperspace to simplify the laws of nature. Without Riemann’s original guiding principle — that the laws of nature become simple in higher dimensions — scientists during this period were groping in the dark. Riemann’s seminal idea of using geometry — that is, crumpled hyperspace — to explain the essence of a a force’ was forgotten during those years … The mathematical apparatus developed by Riemann became a province of pure mathematics, contrary to Riemann’s original intentions. Without field theory, you cannot make any predictions with hyperspace [emphasis added]…”

– M. Kaku, “Hyperspace”
[ Doubleday (Anchor Books): New York, 1994]

Kaku’s statement belies the entire “modern” outlook on 19th Century physics, and leaves the distinct impression of an apparently unconscious “bias” similar to Heaviside’s, regarding Maxwell’s actual treatment of such matters; certainly, in completely ignoring Maxwell’s true discussion of the importance of the underlying four-dimensional “scalar potentials” for creating such “fields.” And remember: Heaviside also thought of such “potentials” as … “mystical …”

The use of little-known Hamiltonian 4-space quaternions, to represent the effect of “scalar potentials” on electric charges (as opposed to Heaviside’s vectorial descriptions of direct “electric force fields”) obviously have led to great confusion; because … Maxwell’s “scalar potentials” are, of course, nothing short of exactly what Riemann initially proposed–

Quantifiable “geometric spatial distortions” … the exact marriage of hyperspatial geometry and field theory that Kaku and others mistakenly believe (because they’re basing their analysis on Heaviside’s surviving vectorial version of Maxwell’s original “Equations”) is totally missing from this greatest achievement of 19th Century physics!


The major source of confusion surrounding Maxwell’s actual Theory, versus what Heaviside reduced it to, is its math — a notation system perhaps best described by H.J. Josephs (“The Heaviside Papers found at Paignton in 1957,” Electromagnetic Theory by Oliver Heaviside, Including an account of Heaviside’s unpublished notes for a fourth volume, and with a forward by Sir Edmund Whittaker, Vol. III, Third Edition, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1971).

According to Josephs:

“Hamilton’s algebra of quaternions, unlike Heaviside’s algebra of vectors, is not a mere abbreviated mode of expressing Cartesian analysis, but is an independent branch of mathematics with its own rules of operation and its own special theorems. A quaternion is, in fact, a generalized or hypercomplex number … [emphasis added]“

And, you will remember, in 1897 Hathaway published a paper specifically identifying these hypercomplex numbers as “… numbers in four-dimensional space” (above). Thus, modern physics’ apparent ignorance of Maxwell’s 19th Century success — a mathematically-based, four-dimensional “field-theory” — would seem to originate from a basic lack of knowledge of the true nature of Hamilton’s quaternion algebra itself!

[Apparently, unless a "hyperdimensional theory" is narrowly expressed in terms of a separate technique Riemann himself invented for his own N-dimensional mapping -- the so-called "metric tensor" -- modern physicists don't seem to be able to recognize it as a valid higher-dimensional model ... not even when it was written in its own, specifically-designed, four-dimensional mathematical notation! (Riemann's "metric tensor," BTW, is essentially a graphical checkerboard composed, for a 4-space description, of 16 numbers defining, for instance, field strength at each point in that four-dimensional space. It is NOT written in quaternions.)

And, unless you track down an original 1873 copy of Maxwell's "Treatise," there is no easy way to verify the existence of Maxwell's "hyperdimensional" quaternion notation; for, by 1892, the Third Edition incorporated a "correction" to Maxwell's original use of "scalar potentials" (contributed by George Francis Fitzgerald -- whom Heaviside heavily admired) -- thus removing a crucial distinction between 4-space "geometric potential," and a 3-space "vector field," from all subsequent "Maxwellian theory." Which is why Kaku apparently doesn't realize that Maxwell's original equations were, in fact, the first geometric 4-space field theory ... expressed in specific 4-space terms ... the language of quaternions!

Just another measure of Heaviside's effectiveness ...]


One of the difficulties of proposing a “higher dimension” is that, inevitably, people (and scientists are people!), will ask: “Ok, where is it? Where is the fourth dimension’ ..?”

One of the most persistent objections to the 4-space geometries of Riemann, Cayley, Tait … and Maxwell, was that no experimental proof of a “fourth dimension” was readily apparent; one of the more easily understandable aspects of “higher dimensionality” was that, a being from a “lower dimension” (a two-dimensional “Flatlander,” for instance) entering our “higher” three-dimensional reality, would appear to vanish instantly from the lower-dimensional world (and, consequently, appear just as suddenly in the higher dimension — but geometrically distorted.) When she returned to her own dimension, she would just as “magically” reappear …

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your perspective …) to the scientific mind, people in our dimension don’t just “turn a corner one day … and promptly vanish into Riemann’s fourth dimension.'” While mathematically derivable and beautifully consistent, to “experimentalists” (and all real science ultimately has to be based on verifiable, independently repeatable experiments) there seemed no testable, physical proof of “hyperdimensional physics.”

Thus “hyperspace”– as a potential solution to unifying the major laws of physics — after Maxwell’s death, and the major rewriting of his Theory, quietly disappeared … not to resurface for almost half a century

Until April of 1919.

At that time, a remarkable letter was delivered to one “Albert Einstein.” Written by an obscure mathematician at the University of Konigsberg in Germany, Theodr Kaluza, the letter’s first few lines offered a startling solution (at least, to Einstein — unknowing of Maxwell’s original quaternion equations) to one of physics’ still most intractable problems: the mathematical unification of his own theory of gravity with Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetic radiation … via introduction of a fifth dimension. (Because Einstein, in formulating the General and Special Theory of Relativity in the intervening years since Riemann, had already appropriated time as the “fourth dimension,” Kaluza was forced to specify his additional spatial dimension as “the fifth.” In fact, this was the same spatial dimension as the 4-space designations used by Maxwell and his colleagues in their models … over 50 years before.)

Despite its stunning (Einstein mulled over the paper’s implications for more than two years, before finally supporting its scientific publication) mathematical success, in apparently — finally — uniting “gravity” and “light,” the same question, “OK, where is it?” was asked of Kaluza as had been asked of Riemann, over 60 years before; because, there was no overt experimental proof (for instance, people and things up and “disappearing”) of the physical existence of another spatial dimension. To which Kaluza this time had a very clever answer: he proposed that this “fourth dimension” — unlike the other three we are familiar with — somehow had collapsed down to a tiny circle … “smaller than the smallest atom …”

In 1926, another essentially unknown mathematician, Oskar Klein, was investigating the peculiar implications of Kaluza’s ideas in the context of the newly-invented atomic theory of “quantum mechanics.” [Klein was a specialist in the truly arcane field of mathematical topology -- the higher dimensional surfaces of objects; the twisted 3-D topology of the 2-D surface of a "Klein Bottle" is named specifically in his honor]. Quantum mechanics had just been proposed a year or so before Klein’s further topological investigation of Kaluza’s ideas, by Max Planck and many others rebelling against perceived limitations of Maxwell’s (remember, heavily sanitized by Gibbs and Heaviside) classical Electromagnetic Theory. The “quantum mechanics ” theory would eventually become a highly successful (if bizarre, by common-sense standards) non-geometric effort to describe interactions between “fundamental particles,” exchanging “forces” through discrete “quantitized” particles and energy in the sub-atomic world. Eventually, combining the two inquiries, Klein theorized that, if it truly existed, Kaluza’s new dimension likely had somehow collapsed down to the “Planck length” itself — supposedly the smallest possible size allowed by these fundamental interactions. However, that size was only about … 10-33 cm long!

Thus, the main obstacle to experimental verification of the Kaluza-Klein Theory (and the reason why people simply didn’t “walk into the fourth dimension”), was that quantum mechanics calculations affirmed that the only way to physically probe such an infinitesimally tiny dimension was with a new machine … an “atom smasher.” There was only one small “technical” problem …

The energy required would exceed the output of all the power plants on Earth … and then some!


Thus, the brief “blip” of new interest in “hyperdimensional physics” — the discussions of Kaluza-Klein among physicists and topologists — “dropped through the floor” by the 1930’s. This occurred both because of Klein’s “proof” of the apparent impossibility of any direct experimental verification of additional dimensions … and because of the dramatic revolution then sweeping the increasingly technological world of Big Science–

The flood of “verifications”gushing forth from atom smashers all around the world, feverishly engaged in probing the new area the experimentalists apparently could verify: the multiplying populations of “fundamental particles”spawned by the bizarre mathematical world (even more bizarre than “N-dimensions”) of Quantum Mechanics.

30 more years would pass … before (almost by mathematical “accident”) in 1968, the current mainstream “flap” of renewed scientific interest in “hyperspace” would be, like the legendary Phoenix, “magically” reborn — a theory now known as “Superstrings” … in which fundamental particles, and “fields,” are viewed as hyperspace vibrations of infinitesimal, multi-dimensional strings … From those relatively inauspicious beginnings, stretching across more than 60 years, the current focus of scientific research papers on “hyperspace” — from continued research into updated versions of the old “Kaluza-Klein Theory”; to discussions of the much newer “Supergravity” hyperspace unification model; to the exotic “String Theory” itself — has grown geometrically (over 5000 papers by 1994 alone, according to Michio Kaku — see above). This much attention to a subject involving realities you can’t even see, represents nothing short of a fundamental psychological revolution sweeping across a major segment of the worldwide scientific community.

For most physicists currently interested in the problem, the “Superstring” hyper-dimensional model has overwhelming advantages over all its predecessors. Besides effectively unifying all the known forces of the Universe … from electromagnetism to the nuclear force … in a literally beautiful “ultimate”picture of Reality, it also makes a specific prediction about the total number of N-dimensions that can form:

“Ten” (or “26,” depending on the rotation of the “strings”).

The bad news is: they can’t be tested either

As all ten dimensions are curled up (in the model) inside the same experimentally unreachable “Planck length” which spelled the scientific demise of the original Kaluza-Klein …

Impasse.


This, then is the current situation.

The “hottest” mainstream scientific theory to come along in more than half a century, the next best thing to a “Theory of Everything” (and seriously attempting to become precisely that …), is not only a Hyperdimensional Model of Reality … it is another one which, by its fundamental nature–

Can’t scientifically be tested!

While a “hyperdimensional model” which can be tested easily — as this paper will unequivocally show — for over a 100 years has been systematically ignored.

Is it just us … or is there something truly wrong with this picture?

Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden, retired army officer and physicist, has been perhaps the most vocal recent proponent for restoring integrity to the scientific and historical record regarding James Clerk Maxwell — by widely promulgating his original equations; in a series of meticulously documented papers on the subject, going back at least 20 years, Bearden has carried on a relentless one-man research effort regarding what Maxwell really claimed. His painstaking, literally thousands of man-hours of original source documentation has led directly to the following, startling conclusion:

Maxwell’s original theory is, in fact, the true, so-called “Holy Grail” of physics … the first successful unified field theory in the history of Science … a fact apparently completely unknown to the current proponents of “Kaluza-Klein,” “Supergravity,” and “Superstring” ideas ….

Just how successful, Bearden documents below:

” … In discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, Heaviside and Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G [electromagnetic/ gravitational] portion of Maxwell’s theory that arises when the translation/directional components of two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar resultant remains and infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a function of oppositive directional/translational components. In the infolding of EM energy inside a scalar potential, a structured scalar potential results, almost precisely as later shown by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific community. The simple vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured only that subset of Maxwell’s theory where EM and gravitation are mutually exclusive. In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and equipment will not ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or inertial effects in materials and equipment.

“Brutally, not a single one of those Heaviside/ Gibbs equations ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk Maxwell, even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation is universally and erroneously taught in all Western universities as Maxwell’s theory.

“As a result of this artificial restriction of Maxwell’s theory, Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general relativity, forever preventing the unification of electromagnetics and relativity. He also essentially prevented the present restricted general relativity from ever becoming an experimental, engineerable science on the laboratory bench, since a hidden internalized electromagnetics causing a deterministically structured local spacetime curvature was excluded.

“Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/ Gibbs externalized electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell’s internalized and ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a structured scalar potential. Accordingly, QM [quantum mechanics] maintained its Gibbs statistics of quantum change, which is nonchaotic a priori. Quantum physicists by and large excluded Bohm’s hidden variable theory, which conceivably could have offered the potential of engineering quantum change — engineering physical reality itself.

“Each of these major scientific disciplines missed and excluded a subset of their disciplinary area, because they did not have the scalar component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further, they completely missed the significance of the Whittaker approach, which already shows how to apply and engineer the very subsets they had excluded.

“What now exists in these areas are three separate, inconsistent disciplines. Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of its discipline, which was the unified field part. Ironically, then, present physicists continue to exert great effort to find the missing key to unification of the three disciplines, but find it hopeless, because these special subsets are already contradictory to one another, as is quite well-known to foundations physicists.

“Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add back the unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each discipline. Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to be one and the same …”

– T.E. Bearden, “Possible Whittaker Unification of
Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics,

(Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801)

Given Bearden’s analysis — what did we actually lose … when science “inadvertently lost Maxwell ..?”


If two key physics papers often cited by Bearden (which appeared decades after the death of Maxwell), are accurate … we lost nothing less than–

The “electrogravitic” control of gravity itself!!

The critically-important research cited by Bearden was originally published by “Sir Edmund Whittaker” (the same cited earlier in this paper), beginning in 1903. The first was titled “On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics” (Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p.333-335); the second, “On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field due to Electrons by means of two Scalar Potential Functions” (Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Vol.1, 1904, p. 367-372).

Whittaker, a leading world-class physicist himself, single-handedly rediscovered the “missing” scalar components of Maxwell’s original quaternions, extending their (at the time) unseen implications for finally uniting “gravity” with the more obvious electrical and magnetic components known as “light.” In the first paper, as Bearden described, Whittaker theoretically explored the existence of a “hidden” set of electromagnetic waves traveling in two simultaneous directions in the scalar potential of the vacuum — demonstrating how to use them to curve the local and/or distant “spacetime” with electromagnetic radiation, in a manner directly analogous to Einstein’s later “mass-curves-space” equations. This key Whittaker paper thus lays the direct mathematical foundation for an electrogravitic theory/technology of gravity control. In the second paper, Whittaker demonstrated how two “Maxwellian scalar potentials of the vacuum” — gravitationally curving spacetime — could be turned back into a detectable “ordinary” electromagnetic field by two interfering “scalar EM waves”… even at a distance.

Whittaker accomplished this by demonstrating mathematically that “the field of force due to a gravitating body can be analyzed, by a spectrum analysis’ as it were, into an infinite number of constituent fields; and although the whole field of force does not vary with time, yet each of the constituent fields is an undulatory character, consisting of a simple-disturbance propagated with uniform velocity … [and] the waves will be longitudinal (top) … These results assimilate the propagation of gravity to that of light … [and] would require that gravity be propagated with a finite velocity, which however need not be the same as that of light [emphasis added], and may be enormously greater …” (Op. Cit., “On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics“)

Remarkably, four years before Whittaker’s theoretical analysis of these potentials (pun intended …), on the evening of July 3-4, 1899, Nikola Tesla (right) — the literal inventor of modern civilization (via the now worldwide technology of “alternating current”) — experimentally anticipated “Whittaker’s interfering scalar waves” by finding them in nature; from massive experimental radio transmitters he had built on a mountain top in Colorado, he was broadcasting and receiving (by his own assertion) “longitudinal stresses” (as opposed to conventional EM “transverse waves”) through the vacuum. This he was accomplishing with his own, hand-engineered equipment (produced according to Maxwell’s original, quaternion equations), when he detected an interference “return” from a passing line of thunderstorms. Tesla termed the phenomenon a “standing columnar wave,” and tracked it electromagnetically for hours as the cold front moved across the West (Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900, Nolit, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1978 pp. 61-62).

[Many have since speculated that Tesla's many other astonishing (to the period) technological accomplishments, many of which apparently "were lost" with his death in 1942, were based on this true understanding of Maxwell's original, "hyperdimensional" electromagnetic ideas ...]

Tesla’s experimental earlier detection notwithstanding, what Whittaker theoretically demonstrated years after Tesla was that future electrical engineers could also take Maxwell’s original 4-space, quaternion description of electromagnetic waves (the real “Maxwell’s Equations”), add his own (Whittaker’s) specific gravitational potential analysis (stemming from simply returning Maxwell’s scalar quaternions in Heaviside’s version of “Maxwell’s Equations”…), and produce a workable “unified field theory” (if not technology!) of gravity control

Unless by now, in some government “black project,” they already have

And what we’ve deliberately been “leaked” over the last seven years, in repeated video images of “exotic vehicles” performing impossible, non-Newtonian maneuvers on official NASA TV shuttle coverage … is simply the result!

Theory is one thing (Maxwell’s or Whittaker’s), but experimental results are supposedly the ultimate Arbiter of Scientific Truth. Which makes it all the more curious that Tesla’s four-year observational anticipation of Whittaker’s startling analysis of Maxwell — the experimental confirmation of an electromagnetic “standing columnar (longitudinal) wave” in thunderstorms — has been resolutely ignored by both physicists and electrical engineers for the past 100 years; as have the stunning NASA TV confirmations of “something” (above) maneuvering freely in Earth orbit.


With that as prologue, a new generation of physicists, also educated in the grand assumption that “Heaviside’s Equations” are actually “Maxwell’s,” were abruptly brought up short in 1959 with another remarkable, equally elegant experiment — which finally demonstrated in the laboratory the stark reality of Maxwell’s “pesky scalar potentials” … those same “mystical” potentials that Heaviside so effectively banished for all time from current (university-taught) EM theory.

In that year two physicists, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm, conducted a seminal “electrodynamics” laboratory experiment (“Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory,” The Physical Review, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 485-491; August, 1959). Aharonov and Bohm, almost 100 years after Maxwell first predicted their existence, succeeded in actually measuring the “hidden potential” of free space, lurking in Maxwell’s original scalar quaternion equations. To do so, they had to cool the experiment to a mere 9 degrees above Absolute Zero, thus creating a total shielding around a superconducting magnetic ring [for a slightly different version of this same experiment -- see diagram; the oscillation of electrical resistance in the ring (bottom graph) is due to the changing electron "wave functions" -- triggered by the "hidden Maxwell scalar potential" created by the shielded magnet -- see text, below].

Once having successfully accomplished this non-trivial laboratory set up, they promptly observed an “impossible” phenomenon:

Totally screened, by all measurements, from the magnetic influence of the ring itself, a test beam of electrons fired by Aharonov and Bohm at the superconducting “donut,” nonetheless, changed their electronic state (“wave functions”) as they passed through the observably “field-free” region of the hole — indicating they were sensing “something,” even though it could NOT be the ring’s magnetic field. Confirmed now by decades of other physicists’ experiments as a true phenomenon (and not merely improper shielding of the magnet), this “Aharonov-Bohm Effect” provides compelling proof of a deeper “spatial strain” — a “scalar potential” — underlying the existence of a so-called magnetic “force-field” itself. (Later experiments revealed a similar effect with shielded electrostatic fields …)

All of which provides compelling proof of “something else,” underlying all reality, capable of transmitting energy and information across space and time … even in the complete absence of an electromagnetically detectable 3-D spatial “field”–

Maxwell’s quaternion … hyperdimensional “potential.”


So, what does all this have to do with NASA’s announcement of a “new planet?”

If a “potential” without a field can exist in space — as Maxwell’s quaternion analysis first asserted, and Aharonov-Bohm “only” a century later ultimately found — then, as defined by Maxwell in his comparisons of the aether with certain properties of laboratory “solids,” such a potential is equivalent to an unseen, vorticular (rotating) “stress” in space. Or, in Maxwell’s own words (first written in 1873 …):

“There are physical quantities of another kind [in the aether] which are related to directions in space, but which are not vectors. Stresses and strains in solid bodies are examples, and so are some of the properties of bodies considered in the theory of elasticity and in the theory of double [rotated] refraction. Quantities of this class require for their definition nine [part of the "27-line"...] numerical specifications. They are expressed in the language of quaternions by linear and vector functions of a vector …”– J.C. Maxwell, “A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism,”
(Vol.1, 3rd Edition, New York, 1954)

And stresses, when they are relieved, must release energy into their surroundings …

There is now much fevered discussion among physicists, (~100 years post-Maxwell) of the Quantum Electrodynamics Zero Point Energy (ZPE) of space — or, “the energy of the vacuum”; to many familiar with the original works of Maxwell, Kelvin, et. al., this sounds an awful lot like the once-familiar “aether” … merely updated and now passing under “an assumed name.” Thus, creating — then relieving — a “stress” in Maxwell’s vorticular aether is precisely equivalent to tapping the “energy of the vacuum” — which, according to current “quantum mechanics’ models,” possesses a staggering amount of such energy per cubic inch of space. Even inefficiently releasing a tiny percentage of this “strain energy” into our three dimensions — or, into a body existing in three-dimensional space — could make it appear as if the energy was coming from nowhere … “something from nothing.” In other words, to an entire generation of students and astrophysicists woefully ignorant of Maxwell’s real equations, such energy would appear as–

“Perpetual motion!”

Given the prodigious amount of “vacuum energy” calculated by modern physicists (trillions of atomic bomb equivalents per cubic centimeter …), even a relatively minor but sudden release of such vast vacuum (aether) stress potential inside a planet … could literally destroy it–

Finally answering the crucial astrophysical objection to the “exploded planet model” that Van Flandern has been encountering …

“But Tom — just how do you blow up’ an entire world?!”

The answer is now obvious: via hyperdimensional “vacuum stress energy” … ala Whittaker and Maxwell.

As we shall show, it is this “new” source of energy — in a far more “controlled” context — that seems also to be responsible now for not only the “anomalous infrared excesses” observed in the so-called “giant outer planets” of this solar system–

It is this same source of energy (in the Hyperdimensional Physics Model) that, according to our analysis, must now be primarily responsible for the radiated energies of stars … including the Sun itself.

Since, in three dimensions, all energy eventually “degrades” to random motions — via Kelvin and Gibb’s 19th Century Laws of Thermodynamics (it’s called “increasing entropy”) — “stress energy” of the aether (vacuum) released inside a material object, even if it initially appears in a coherent form — driving, for instance, the anomalous (1400 mile-per-hour!), planet-girdling winds of distant Neptune’s “jet streams” — will eventually degrade to simple, random heat … ultimately radiated away as “excess infrared emissions” into space. It’s the initial, astrophysical conditions under which such “Maxwellian space potentials” can be released inside a planet (or a star …), that have been the central focus of our efforts for ten years –

To create a predictive, mathematical “hyperdimensional model” of such physics.

The entire question comes down to–

“What set of known spatial conditions will slowly, predictably, release the potential strains of 4-space into 3-space’ … inside a massive world … so that when this energy inevitably degrades to heat, its radiative signature identifies the original hyperdimensional’ source?”

Fortunately, we are surrounded by almost half a dozen examples close at hand: the giant, “anomalously radiating” planets of this solar system (and some major moons). Over the past decade, as we have attempted to understand their anomalous IR radiation, one thing has become clear — to a first order, the “infrared excesses” of the giant planets all seem to correlate very nicely with one parameter each has in common — regardless of their individual masses, elemental compositions, or distance from the Sun:

Their total system “angular momentum.”

The mass of a body and the rate at which it spins, in classical physics, determines an object’s “angular momentum.” In our Hyperdimensional Model, its a bit more complicated — because objects apparently separated by distance in this (3-space) dimension are in fact connected in a “higher” (4-space) dimension; so, in the HD model, one also adds in the orbital momentum of an object’s gravitationally-tethered satellites — moons in the case of planets; planets, in the case of the Sun, or companion stars in the case of other stars.

When one graphs the total angular momentum of a set of objects — such as the radiating outer planets of this solar system (plus Earth and Sun) — against the total amount of internal energy each object radiates to space, the results are striking:

The more total system angular momentum a planet (or any celestial body) possesses (as defined above — object plus satellites), the greater its intrinsic “brightness,” i.e. the more “anomalous energy” it apparently is capable of “generating.”

And, as can be seen from this key diagram, this striking linear dependence now seems to hold across a range of luminosity and momentum totaling almost three orders of magnitude … almost 1000/1!

Especially noteworthy, the Earth (not “a collapsing gas giant,” by any stretch of the imagination) also seems to fit precisely this empirical energy relationship: when the angular momentum of the Moon is added to the “spin momentum” of its parent planet, the resulting correlation with measurements derived from internal “heat budget” studies of the Earth are perfectly fitted to this solar-system-wide empirical relationship — even though the Earth’s internal energy is supposedly derived from “radioactive sources.”

And, as can be seen from the accompanying historical comparison, this striking solar system linear relationship is actually more tightly constrained (even at this early stage) than the original Hubble “redshift data” supporting the Big Bang!

This discovery contains major implications, not only for past geophysics and terrestrial evolution … but for future geological and climatological events — “Earth changes,” as some have termed them. These may be driven, not by rising solar interactions or by-products of terrestrial civilization (accumulating “greenhouse gases” from burning fossil fuels), but by this same “hyperdimensional physics.” If so, then learning a lot more about the mechanisms of this physics — and quickly! — is a critical step toward intervening and eventually controlling our future well-being, if not our destiny, on (and off!) this planet …

For the “Hyperdimensional Physics” model, this simple but powerful relationship now seems to be the equivalent of Relativity’s E=MC2 : a celestial object’s total internal luminosity seems dependent upon only one physical parameter:

L=mr2 = total system angular momentum (object, plus all satellites)


There is a well-known “rule of thumb” in science, perhaps best expressed by a late Noble Laureate, physicist Richard Feynman:

“You can recognize truth by its beauty and simplicity. When you get it right, it is obvious that it is right — at least if you have any experience — because usually what happens is that more comes out than goes in … The inexperienced, the crackpots, and people like that, make guesses that are simple, but you can immediately see that they are wrong, so that does not count. Others, the inexperienced students, make guesses that are very complicated, and it sort of looks as if it is all right, but I know it is not true because the truth always turns out to be simpler that you thought …”

This startling relationship — our discovery of the simple dependence of an object’s internal luminosity on its total system angular momentum — has that “feel” about it; it is simple … it is elegant … in fact–

It could even be true.

But, as can be seen from examining the luminosity/angular momentum diagram again, there also appears to be one glaring exception to this otherwise strikingly linear relationship:

The Sun itself.

Independent research, involving over 30 years of attempted confirmation of the Sun’s basic energy source — in the form of solar/terrestrial observations of tiny atomic particles called “neutrinos,” supposedly coming from the center of the Sun — have left laboratory physicists and astrophysicists with a major astronomical enigma:

The Sun is not emitting anything like the number of neutrinos required by the “Standard Solar Model” for its observed energy emission; if its energy is due to “thermo-nuclear reactions” (as the Standard Model demands), then the observed “neutrino deficit” is upwards of 60%: even more remarkable, certain kinds of primary neutrinos (calculated as required to explain the bulk of the solar interior’s fusion reactions, based on laboratory measurements) turn out to be simply missing altogether!

So — what really fuels the Sun?

The answer to the Sun’s apparent violation of the Standard Solar Model — ironically, is contained in its striking “violation” of our key angular momentum/luminosity diagram:

In the Hyperdimensional Model, the Sun’s primary energy source — like the planets’ — must be driven by its total angular momentum — its own “spin momentum,” plus the total angular momentum of the planetary masses orbiting around it. Any standard astronomical text reveals that, though the Sun contains more than 98% of the mass of the solar system, it contains less than 2% of its total angular momentum. The rest is in the planets. Thus, in adding up their total contribution to the Sun’s angular momentum budget — if the HD model is correct — we should see the Sun following the same line on the graph that the planets, from Earth to Neptune, do.

It doesn’t.

The obvious answer to this dilemma is that the HD model is simply wrong.

The less obvious is that we’re missing something …

Like … additional planets (above)!

By adding another big planet (or a couple of smaller ones) beyond Pluto (several hundred times the Earth’s distance from the Sun — below), we can move the Sun’s total angular momentum to the right on the graph, until it almost intersects the line (allowing for a percentage, about 30%, of internal energy expected from genuine thermonuclear reactions …). This creates the specific “HD prediction” that “the current textbook tally of the Sun’s angular momentum is deficient because …”

We haven’t discovered all the remaining members of the solar system yet!

As a dividend, this promptly presents us with our first key test of the Hyperdimensional Model:

1) Find those planets!

The second test of the Hyperdimensional Model is that, unlike other efforts to explain anomalous planetary energy emissions via continued “planetary collapse,” or “stored primordial heat,” the hyperdimensional approach specifically predicts one radical, definitive observational difference from all other existing explanations–

2) HD energy generation in both planets and stars should be — must be — variable.

This is simply implicit in the mechanism which generates the hyperdimensional energy in the first place: ever changing hyperspatial geometry.


If the ultimate source of planetary (or stellar) energy is this “vorticular (rotating) spatial stress between dimensions” (ala Maxwell), then the constantly changing pattern (both gravitationally and dimensionally) of interacting satellites in orbit around a major planet/star must modulate that stress pattern as a constantly changing, geometrically twisted “aether” (ala Whittaker’s amplifications of Maxwell). In our Hyperdimensional Model, it is this “constantly changing hyperspatial geometry” that is capable (via resonant rotations with the masses in question — either as spin, or circular orbital motions) of extracting energy from this underlying “rotating, vorticular aether” … and then releasing it inside material objects.

Initially, this “excess energy” can appear in many different forms — high-speed winds, unusual electrical activity, even enhanced nuclear reactions — but, ultimately, it must all degrade to simple “excess heat.” Because of the basic physical requirement for resonance in effectively coupling a planet (or a star’s) “rotating 3-D mass to the underlying 4-D aether rotation,” this excess energy generation must also, inevitably, vary with time — as the changing orbital geometry of the “satellites” interacts with the spinning primary (and the underlying, “vorticular aether”…) in and out-of-phase.

For these reasons, as stated earlier, time-variability of this continuing energy exchange must be a central hallmark of this entire “HD process.”

[Incidentally, understanding this basic "hyperdimensional transfer mechanism," in terms of Maxwell's original quaternions (that describe "a rotating, vorticular, four-dimensional sponge-like aether"), immediately lends itself to creating a "Hyperdimensional Technology" based on this same mechanism.

The fundamental "violations" of current physics exhibited by so-called "free energy" machines -- from the explicitly-rotating "N-machine" to the initially frustrating time-variable aspects of "electro-chemical cold fusion"-- are now elegantly explained by appropriate application of Maxwell's original ideas.

Even more extraordinary: the recent startling demonstration, broadcast nationwide on ABC's "Good Morning America" last year, of a "physically impossible" major reduction -- in a few minutes! -- of long-lived radioactive Uranium isotopes. Normally, such processes require billions of years to accomplish. This too is now elegantly explained by the Hyperdimensional Model-- As -- an "induced hyperspatial stress," created by the machine ... the same stress that initially (in the Model) induces "unstable isotopes" in the first place. By technologically enhancing such vacuum stress within these nuclei, via a retuning of Maxwell's "scalar potentials," the normal radioactive breakdown process is accelerated -- literally billions of times ...

The implications for an entire "rapid, radioactive nuclear waste reduction technology" -- accomplishing in hours what would normally require aeons -- is merely one immediate, desperately needed world-wide application of such "Hyperdimensional Technologies."]


In our own planetary system, all the “giant” planets possess a retinue of at least a dozen satellites: one or two major ones (approximating the size of the planet Mercury) … with several others ranging down below the diameter and mass of our own Moon … in addition to a host of smaller objects; because of the “lever effect” in the angular momentum calculations, even a small satellite orbiting far away (or at a steep angle to the planet’s plane of rotation) can exert a disproportional effect on the “total angular momentum” equation — just look at Pluto and the Sun.

Even now, Jupiter’s four major satellites (which have collective masses approximately 1/10,000th of Jupiter itself), during the course of their complex orbital interactions, are historically known to cause time-altered behavior in a variety of well-known Jovian phenomena–

Including — “anomalous” latitude and longitude motions of the Great Red Spot itself.

As we presented at the U.N. in 1992, the Great Red Spot — a mysterious vortex located for over 300 years at that “infamous” 19.5 degrees S. Latitude, via the circumscribed tetrahedral geometry of the equally infamous “27 line problem” — is the classic “hyperdimensional signature” of HD physics operating within Jupiter.

The existence of decades of recorded “anomalous motions” of this Spot, neatly synchronized with the highly predictable motions of Jupiter’s own moons, are clearly NOT the result of conventional “gravitational” or “tidal” interactions — in view of the relatively insignificant masses of the moons compared to Jupiter itself; but, following Maxwell and Whittaker, the hyperdimensional effects of these same moons — via the long “lever” of angular momentum on the constantly changing, vorticular scalar stress potentials inside Jupiter — that is a very different story …

So, Hyperdimensional Test number three:

3) Look for small, short-term amplitude-variations in the infrared emission levels of all the giant planets … synchronized (as are the still-mysterious motions of the GRS on Jupiter) with the orbital motions and conjunctions of their moons.

All NASA models for the “anomalous energy emissions” of these planets have assumed a steady output; the “snapshot” values derived from the mere few hours of Voyager fly-bys in the 1980’s are now firmly listed in astronomy texts as new “planetary constants”; the reason: the emissions are viewed by NASA as either “primordial heat,” stored across the aeons; energy release from internal long-term radioactive processes; or literal, slight settling of portions of the entire planet, still releasing gravitational potential energy … all processes that will not change perceptibly even in thousands of years!

Confirmed short-term variations in the current planetary IR outputs, of “a few hours” (or even a few days) duration — and synchronized with the orbital periods of the planets’ satellites themselves — would thus be stunning evidence that all the “mainstream” explanations are in trouble … and that the Hyperdimensional Model deserves much closer scrutiny …

In this same vein: unlike all “conventional NASA explanations,” in a phenomenon akin to “hyperdimensional astrology,” the HD model also specifically predicts significantly larger, long-term variability in these major planetary IR outputs … of several years duration. These (like the shorter variations triggered by the changing geometry between the satellites) should be caused by the constantly changing hyperdimensional (spatial stress) interactions between the major planets themselves … as they continually change their geometry relative to one another, each orbiting the Sun with a different relative velocity.

These changing interactive stresses in the “boundary between hyperspace and real’ space” (in the Hyperdimensional Model) now also seem to be the answer to the mysterious “storms” that, from time to time, have suddenly appeared in the atmospheres of several of the outer planets. The virtual “disappearance,” in the late 80’s, of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is one remarkable example; Saturn’s abrupt production of a major planetary “event,” photographed by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1994 as a brilliant cloud erupting at 19.5 degrees N. (where else?!), is yet another.

Since the prevailing NASA view is that these planets’ “excess” IR output must be constant over time, no one has bothered to look for any further correlations — between a rising or falling internal energy emission … and the (now, historically well-documented) semi-periodic eruptions of such “storms.”

They should.

There is a very well-known, long-period, and still mysterious variability associated with the largest “hyperdimensional gate” in our own neighborhood — our “local” star, the Sun.

Its complex changes, which include a host of related surface phenomena — solar flares, coronal disturbances, mass ejections, etc. — is termed “the sunspot cycle” … because the number of simultaneous “spots” (lower-temperature vortices appearing “dark” against the hotter solar surface, as this activity occurs — left) waxes and wanes over about 11 years. (The full magnetic reversal of the Sun’s polarity takes two complete sunspot cycles to return to “zero” — thus the complete “solar cycle” is about 20 years.)

In the 1940’s, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) hired a young electrical engineer — John Nelson — in an effort to improve the reliability of HF (“short-wave”) radio communications around Earth. Such radio transmissions had been observed to be, for some reason, more reliable in the “lulls” in between, than during solar activity associated with “peak” sunspot years.

To his surprise, Nelson soon specifically correlated this rising and falling radio interference with not only sunspot cycle, but with the motions of the major planets of the solar system; he found, to his increasing astonishment, a very repeatable — in essence, astrological correlation … between the inexorable orbits of all the planets (but especially, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune — which, remember, hold essentially all the solar’s system’s known angular momentum) … and major radio-disturbing eruptions on the Sun!

The Hyperdimensional Model finally provides a comprehensive theoretical explanation — a “linking mechanism” — for these, to a lot of astronomers, still embarrassing decades-old RCA observations. For, in essence what John Nelson had rediscovered was nothing short of a “Hyperdimensional Astrology” — the ultimate, very ancient, now highly demonstrable angular momentum foundations behind the real influences of the Sun and planets on our lives …

For, as part of his solar research, Nelson also “rediscovered” something else …

“It is worthy of note that in 1948 when Jupiter and Saturn were spaced by 120 degrees, and solar activity was at a maximum, radio signals averaged of far higher quality for the year than in 1951 with Jupiter and Saturn at 180 degrees and a considerable decline in solar activity. In other words, the average quality curve of radio signals followed the cycle curve between Jupiter and Saturn rather than the sunspot curve … [emphasis added].”– J.H. Nelson, “Planetary Position Effect on
Short-Wave Signal Quality

(Electrical Engineering, May 1952)

These decades-old observations are very telling … not only confirming Jupiter and Saturn as the primary “drivers” behind the Sun’s known cycle of activity (in the HD Model), but strongly implying an additional direct effect of their changing angular relationship on the electrical properties of Earth’s ionosphere. This, of course, is totally consistent with these changing planetary geometries affecting not just the Sun, but the other planets as well … just as “conventional” astrologers have claimed — via Maxwell’s “changing scalar potentials”…

Therefore, at this point, only the hyperdimensional theory–

1) Points to the (literally!) deepest implications of the simple astronomical fact that the “tail wags the dog”– that the planets in this physics are fully capable of exerting a determinant influence on the Sun — and each other — through their disproportionate ratio of total solar system angular momentum … over 100 to 1, in the [known!] planets’ favor.

Only the Hyperdimensional Model–

2) Possesses the precise physical mechanism — via Maxwell’s “changing quaternion scalar potentials” — accounting for this “anomalous” planetary angular momentum influence.

And, only the HD theory–

3) Has already publicly identified, at the United Nations, in 1992, a blatant geometric clue to this entire HD solar process: the maximum sunspot numbers (those large, relatively “cool,” rotating vortices appearing on the solar surface), rising and falling and methodically changing latitude, during the course of the familiar 22-year solar cycle–

And peaking every half-cycle (~11 years), at the hyperdimensionally-significant solar latitude of ~ “19.5 degrees!”

Furthermore, recent discoveries via the indirect technique of “helioseismology” (optical monitoring of sound waves vibrating back and forth within the Sun), have revealed another clear solar “hyper-dimensional signature at play; a curious “jet,” flowing around the north pole several thousand miles below the visible solar surface; the remarkable similarity to an equivalent phenomenon discovered by Voyager flowing around the north pole of Saturn — a “polar hexagon” in the clouds — even to the latitude, seems just a bit “too coincidental.”

Unfortunately, because the discovery is not based on direct imaging (as with Voyager), but on an indirect “sub-surface flow” technique, the investigators have rounded off the corners of the potential sub-surface “solar hexagon“; in fact, they should consult more frequently with their NASA planetary colleagues for additional examples of this geometric, now clearly hyperdimensional “flow pattern” elsewhere in the solar system …

The increasing identification of the hyperdimensional mechanism underlying the Sun’s primary energy production has, unfortunately, brought with it certain inevitable, potentially disquieting predictions …


Described first by Kepler as his “Third Law,” the farther out a planet orbits from its star the longer is its period of revolution. Since we’re talking about possible additional planets driving this entire Hyperdimensional Solar Process (see again angular momentum diagram, above) — planets that must be hundreds of times farther from the Sun than Earth (Pluto is “only” 40 times its distance, and orbits in “only” about 250 years) — the “years” of these extremely distant worlds could equal thousands if not tens of thousands of Earth’s year … depending on their orbits. Because of these immense orbital periods, the cycles of solar energy production driven by their combined angular momentum will also be v-e-r-y long, indeed–

Perhaps as long as ~26,000 years … (remember that number).

Also remember that such distant planets — even if not particularly massive — will have a disproportionately large effect on the total solar HD energy generation, because of the enormous “leverage” in the angular momentum equation with increasing distance. Thus, these still undiscovered worlds must in fact account for most of the solar energy we see … depending on the actual orbital periods; the repeated ultra-long-term phasings of their orbits — creating equally long-term angular momentum resonances in the Sun — must produce resulting long-term cyclic changes in the Sun’s total luminosity … lasting literally thousands of years … far longer than the short-term, historical “sunspot cycle” Nelson first linked directly to the known members of the solar system.

There is already a well-known link, between the historical 11-year “sunspot cycle” — increased solar flares, x-ray emission, frequency of “coronal mass ejections,” etc. — and a measurable (if inexplicable as yet) increase in total solar energy production. Misnamed “the solar constant,” this cyclic increase and decrease (according to satellite measurements) is curiously in phase with the current sunspot cycle … averaging about 0.15%.

This NASA-documented short-term variation of the entire Sun, is now directly traceable (in the HD Model) to the changing geometric phase relationships between the solar system’s two largest known planets, Jupiter and Saturn (as Nelson long ago confirmed); their orbital conjunctions — when both worlds return again to the same geometric position, relative to one another — take place on average roughly every 20 years … the mean of the full “magnetic” solar cycle! (At the “half cycle” — the familiar 11-year sunspot period itself — Jupiter and Saturn are, of course, 180 degrees out of phase … a critical clue to the determinate, modulating hyperspatial geometry actually inherent in this process …)

But, if the known changes in solar output are due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest known planets, what of the magnitude of “aether stress” produced by our proposed “new planets” — with angular momentum contributions hundreds of times greater?; the long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic phasings (yet-to-be-experienced in recorded history …) could measure as much as several percent above current solar output. This is more than enough additional energy — even without Mankind’s current addition of significant “greenhouse gasses” to the atmosphere — to trigger profound, millennia-long climatic changes here on Earth–

Including … melting ice caps; rising ocean levels; dramatic changes in jet stream altitudes and activity; increased tornado intensities; increased hurricane wind velocities … and–

A permanentEl Nino” (whose warmest waters, satellites report, are at … ~19.5 degrees).

And that’s saying nothing about HD energy added to the internal workings of our planet …

From all indications, we are now well into just such a new, long-term, cyclic solar period … just as the HD Model has predicted. The implications should be obvious.


Enter once more, Susan Terebey.

With the discovery and official NASA announcement of Dr. Terebey’s “new planet” — a “Jovian-type” world 450 light years away … yet, in apparent total isolation — we have the perfect conditions for a new series of crucial tests of the “Hyperdimensional Model,” starting with–

1) Systematic spectroscopic observations (carried out over days or months), to detect the presence of any satellites of this proposed Jovian-type world. Curiously, this possibility has not even been alluded to in any of the official NASA presentations on this object (see NASA artist’s depiction).

It is almost inconceivable that such a giant world could have formed without multiple orbiting satellites; just look at the “miniature solar systems” of moons orbiting the major planets of this solar system …

Confirmation of such additional objects would in itself be another major scientific “first.” But, in this case, it would also have far deeper implications; some of those same moons could have considerable mass themselves — perhaps as much as Mars … or even Earth … depending on the parent planet’s mass. The latter could, in fact, be independently determined (via appropriate application of “Kepler’s Laws”) through physical detection of such moons and determining their orbital periods. This would then provide a completely independent calibration of the accuracy of the “primary object’s” currently estimated mass — derived, as Terebey’s freely admits, solely from theoretical “cooling curves” (see above) and the “new planet’s” measured IR luminosity itself.

These additional remarkable objects (if they exist …) should be detectable with a variety of present astronomical technologies — including Hubble — provided someone looks.

[And, confirmation of truly massive satellites (a "Mars" or "Earth") circling this new "potential planet" could vindicate, in a stroke, a major piece of Van Flandern's own revolutionary model -- that our own Mars (if not a number of other objects) once orbited a larger planet in this solar system as satellites ... until all (including Mars) were released by the catastrophic explosion of that "parent world."

Van Flandern, one of the world's leading celestial mechanics experts, has calculated the probable orbital parameters of such an extraordinary event -- and has reached the conclusion that Mars' uniquely elliptical path around the Sun (of all the inner planets) is highly consistent with its "escape" from such a "missing," former member of the solar system ...]


Successful detection of a “Mars” or “Earth” (or any significant satellites) orbiting Susan Terebey’s “new planet” would immediate present possibilities for carrying out the same variety of HD tests proposed (above) for the outer planets of this solar system, starting with–

2) Detection of distinct variations in the “new planet’s” own infrared emissions — synchronized with the calculated orbital periods of any detected satellites (or resonances thereof …). This would offer immediate, compelling evidence for the general correctness of the “Hyperdimensional Model” … especially, if such IR signatures could be matched with similar types of time-varying emissions observed radiating from the giant planets of this solar system …

Such confirmations would provide crucial and timely evidence supporting the basic correctness of the “HD Model.” Equally important, if such confirmations are forthcoming, the extraordinary possibility will be further enhanced that this same fundamental physics, in our own solar system, could … and has–

Destroyed entire worlds


For those who need a “practical” reason to address these issues, consider this:

Understanding the conditions under which these types of “epochal events” could come to pass … and if, through proper understanding and control of “HD Physics,” they can be averted for our planet … would seem a simple, basic rationale for renewed interest in what Maxwell really stated. Given the demonstrable, historically-unprecedented changes currently occurring in our own environment — from mysteriously-rising geophysical and volcanic activity (some of the most significant now occurring at that suspicious “19.5 degrees!”), to increasingly anomalous climatological and meteorological activity (does anyone notice that hurricanes have always been born at an average latitude of …19.5 degrees?) — verifying the effects of a changing “hyperdimensional physics” in our own neighborhood is far from being “merely academic.”

Then, of course, there are the continuing, dramatic changes in the Sun

Immediate solar predictions of the HD Model are simple and quite clear: increasingly violent average solar surface activity — modulated with the rising and falling with the familiar “sunspot cycle” of ~11 years (cycle #23 should be a “lulu!”) — taking place against a backdrop of equally dramatic, long-term rising of total solar energy emission.

The major unknown is the overall effect of this slowly increasing “HD energy” availability throughout the entire solar system; for, remember, the changing “aether stress” is not localized inside stars or planets; these concentrations of “matter” merely allow us to trace the visible effects — like red dye in clear water — of these underlying, changing “hyperspatial strains.” Thus, the overall dynamical effect of the Earth’s own significant (to us!) angular momentum interaction with this changing solar system physics — including its own long-term, “higher order rotation,” the ~26,000 year precessional cycle and the mysterious role of the Moon — is all still quite uncertain …

However, recent anomalous observations of perhaps the most fundamental dynamical parameter of Earth — its own rotation — seem to support this growing perception that “something” indeed is rapidly changing in the solar system …

For some inexplicable reason, there has been an accelerating slow-down of the Earth’s spin on its own axis over the last twenty years — as measured against electronic transitions of the “Cesium Atomic Clock,” maintained at the National Bureau of Standards, in Boulder, Colorado.

Theoretically stable to “plus or minus one second in a million years …” the official atomic clocks have literally had to be adjusted by over 20 seconds in these preceding two decades — a stunning change by astronomical standards, and striking confirmation of some kind of major, “progressive phase-shift” now occurring, between the rotation of our planet and the atomic-level “constants” that govern the quantum standards of the Clock. This need to, with increasing frequency (now, approximately every six months) update a full second differential between “dynamical time” and “time at the atomic level,” is profound confirmation of some kind of fundamental coupling between the angular momentum of our own planet, and the larger changes occurring in the hyperspatial physics of the solar system … as outlined in the basic HD Model. This includes the possibility that these changing “hyperspatial stresses,” due to the progressive orbital movement of our as-yet-undiscovered “outer planets” (in the Model) are simply causing increasing “Maxwellian scalar potential changes” all across the solar system at the atomic level — changing (via the “Aharonov-Bohm Effect”) all resultant quantum-level “constants” governing the clocks by small (but laboratory-measurable) amounts.

If this is true, it could thus be the Clocks themselves that are also internally changing … simultaneous with the predicted, accelerating slow-down in the basic rotation of the Earth!

Additional evidence that “something major” is occurring in the solar system, is the recent announcement (by three major “world-class” laboratories) of startling changes in another fundamental physical parameter — the Gravitational Constant; according to an article published in “Science News” in 1995, not only has this centuries-old “constant” been found to differ now from all previous “textbook” values … each of the three laboratories reported different changes … the largest amounting to a whopping (by measurement standards) 0.06%!

Completely inexplicable by any mainstream theories, such changes are intrinsically expected (ala Whittaker’s derivation of “electrogravitic” linkages between gravity and light) in the true Maxwellian analysis of “varying scalar potentials” of the vacuum. Again: changes modulated by the changing phase relationships between our proposed “undiscovered outer planets” in the “total solar system angular momentum equation.”

There is insufficient room to develop here (let alone to document) all the additional implications stemming from this Model (that will be done elsewhere). Suffice it to say, this is intrinsically a changing physics, affecting every known system of astronomical, physical, chemical and biological interaction differently over time — because it affects the underlying, dynamical hyperspace foundation of “physical reality” itself … starting with this solar system; that is implicit in the Model.

And now, according to all accumulating evidence and this centuries-old physics … we are simply entering once again (after “only” 13,000 years …) a phase of this recurring, grand solar system cycle “of renewed hyperdimensional restructuring of that reality …


It is for these basic reasons that NASA must now openly — and rapidly — carry out these recommended new observations of the solar system, including additional, detailed measurements of “TMR-1C” … and then immediately tell us the results.

Time is getting short.

The Hyperdimensional Resonator

The Hyper Dimensional Resonator is one of the most advanced instruments of it’s kind in the entire world. An advanced Psychotronic two dial, one bank unit that has many uses. It is primarily designed as an astral projectiontime machine and unlimited white light generator. The unit comes with a witness well, rubbing plate, multidimensional stabilizer, clear switch, power switch, and time-coil. It is the only unit of it’s kind in the world. If you have ever had difficulties astral projecting then this device can help you to succeed. Strictly a research tool.

Operational Procedures

The unit works similar to a radionic unit. The two dials are tuned radionically to the date and time you wish to travel to. The time coil headband sends the vibrational energy of that time into your third eye. After this is done for 5-10 minutes, you meditate and your astral body should be transported to the date and time you chose. If you have done the procedure on a grid point or vortex, you may even be physically transported in time. The unit comes with complete written instructions for proper use.